• NOW LIVE! Into the Woods--new character species, eerie monsters, and haunting villains to populate the woodlands of your D&D games.

Wilden Name Poll! -- Forked Thread: PH3 Playtest Race: Wilden

What should be the name of the race currently known as Wilden?

  • Wilden, the current name.

    Votes: 31 21.2%
  • Killoren, the 3e name.

    Votes: 37 25.3%
  • Woodwose or Wose, a folklore name for "green men"

    Votes: 37 25.3%
  • Sylvans, for that dead language feel.

    Votes: 25 17.1%
  • Other (please post your suggestion)

    Votes: 16 11.0%


log in or register to remove this ad




I would have picked Arborean but I don't really care, the concept isn't that compelling to begin with.
A made-up name would only reinforce its artificiality.
Sylvan is too generic and I see woses as hairy wild men.

I wouldn't get your hopes too high. There were polls to change the name "warlord" to something else, too.
Maybe polls won't work but mocking and whining about "golden wyvern" and "emerald frost" did.
 


We already have that name: LeShay, from the Epic Handbook.

First of all, that critter is absolutely nothing like the lesidhe in lore, which are fey spirits who specifically look like foliage, i.e. they appear very plantlike, and are generally shy, non-violent pranksters. As opposed to immortal albino elves concerned greatly with etiquette and formality (just about the exact opposite of shy, reclusive pranksters). It was merely another suggestion for a name, pulled straight out of real mythological lore (as much of D&D is), whereas the LeShay have quite literally nothing in common with said mythology save the word "fey".

Second, it is neither pronounced nor spelled the same (lay-shee vs leh-shay), meaning no confusion between lesidhe and LeShay.

Third, this is a race related to 4E, not 3.5.

So, umm...

:erm:
 


First of all, that critter is absolutely nothing like the lesidhe in lore, which are fey spirits who specifically look like foliage, i.e. they appear very plantlike, and are generally shy, non-violent pranksters. As opposed to immortal albino elves concerned greatly with etiquette and formality (just about the exact opposite of shy, reclusive pranksters). It was merely another suggestion for a name, pulled straight out of real mythological lore (as much of D&D is), whereas the LeShay have quite literally nothing in common with said mythology save the word "fey".

Second, it is neither pronounced nor spelled the same (lay-shee vs leh-shay), meaning no confusion between lesidhe and LeShay.

Third, this is a race related to 4E, not 3.5.

So, umm...

:erm:
Hey, I'm not shooting down the name or anything. If we tie it to the Feywild, then a "sidhe"-based name is certainly in order!
 

First of all, that critter is absolutely nothing like the lesidhe in lore, which are fey spirits who specifically look like foliage, i.e. they appear very plantlike, and are generally shy, non-violent pranksters. As opposed to immortal albino elves concerned greatly with etiquette and formality (just about the exact opposite of shy, reclusive pranksters). It was merely another suggestion for a name, pulled straight out of real mythological lore (as much of D&D is), whereas the LeShay have quite literally nothing in common with said mythology save the word "fey".
I wonder where you get this spelling from. I know of the slavic leshy (leh-shee) or lesovik, who is a shapechanging woodland spirit with tree-like characteristics (mossy beard and foliage for hair, similar to some depictions of trolls). "Lesidhe" suggests something related to the celtic sidhe but I've never heard of it in celtic lore.
 
Last edited:

Into the Woods

Remove ads

Top