jonesy
A Wicked Kendragon
Dragon #95: article: The Influence of J.R.R Tolkien on the D&D and AD&D games, by Gary Gygax:Several sources, yes. Primarily Tolkien, absolutely.
[snip] ..minimal..
Dragon #95: article: The Influence of J.R.R Tolkien on the D&D and AD&D games, by Gary Gygax:Several sources, yes. Primarily Tolkien, absolutely.
DM: "You arrive to a valley. There is something fantastic up ahead, but it's hard to see due to the bright light it is emitting.."
Player 1: "Hang on. I'm not wearing socks with my work boots. Does anyone have spare socks?"
DM: "..it has noticed you and speaks. It says.."
Player 2: "I've got socks I'm not using. But they were given to me by my grandfather. They're my lucky socks. I wouldn't want them to get dirty."
DM: "..guys? The amazing creature bathed in angelic light is talking to you. It wants.."
Player 3: "I thought you never wore socks with your work boots? Why do you need them now?"
Player 1: "Last adventure I got a hole in my boots, and now there's snow on the ground. It's getting a bit chilly here."
Player 2: "Oh, ok. You can have my lucky socks."
Player 1: "Thanks. Are these wool? They're really nice."
Player 3: "They do look nice, actually. You wouldn't happen to have another pair?"
DM: "..guys? Guys? Nevermind, it went away."
![]()
Dragon #95: article: The Influence of J.R.R Tolkien on the D&D and AD&D games, by Gary Gygax:
[snip] ..minimal..
As details do. But there's only so much time one can spend, and I'd rather not spend it too much on equipment. Unless it's something you really need to describe to understand.That's actually pretty funny. Take out the part about the angelic being, and you've got a great example of why we use this type of detail in our game. Sometimes scenes like these DO HAPPEN in our games. We laugh our be-hineys off. Again, the detail enhances our game.
I think your basic assumption of D&D fitting a tolkien-esque universe is wrong. D&D represents a melting-pot of different fantasy (and even sf) styles and tropes. Tolkien's influence is only one among many and it's definitely not the most important one.Does anybody have a problem with the Tumble skill? It doesn't seem to fit the D&D tolkien-esque universe at all. You've got a Daryl-Hannah-Type-In-Blade-Runner come flopping your way, doing the cheerleader thing, and you can't touch her with an Attack of Opportunity as you moves through your square?[...]
What do you think?
Tolkien is only one of many sources of inspiration listed in Appendix N, and Gygax himself made it abundantly clear over the years that he was by far a lesser one. Even the quote you cite implies that the Tolkien-esque material was included only grudgingly.
So I have to disagree with you. D&D's real roots lay in pulp "sword and sorcery," not Tolkien.
I think your basic assumption of D&D fitting a tolkien-esque universe is wrong. D&D represents a melting-pot of different fantasy (and even sf) styles and tropes. Tolkien's influence is only one among many and it's definitely not the most important one.
My "problem" with Tumble is that it seems to be a bit "specialized" when most of the skills are quite broad.
Specialized?![]()
The rules already have equipment affect your tumbling: you can only do it with light load and take armor check penalty. If that's not enough to you, there are probably other skills and abilities for which the same is true.
Specialized may be the wrong word. I meant that most adventurers aren't decked out in clothes and equipment that lend themselves to floppin' around.