Dungeon 170: Monument of the Ancients

Good to see my original question continues to be ignored. Consistency is a virtue.

Hey turd, who peed in your Wheaties? If your question wasn't answered, why the heck didn't you ask it again or just PM me?

Maram is one of the seven lost gods.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad


Good to see my original question continues to be ignored. Consistency is a virtue.


Yes, well, so is politeness. If you are unhappy with how others approach your question, you'd probably get a better response if you left behind the snark. Perhaps you hadn't noticed, but it is not a useful tool for actually getting people to do what you want on the internet.




Ladies and gentlemen, calling someone on these boards a turd is a good way to get yourself banned for a while. Like Matt, here, who's going to be taking a little break.
 

Matt James response was unprofessional and uncalled for even if the other fellow was snarky. Hopefully he can act more decently in the future or I wont have anymore of his material in my collection.
 

Matt James response was unprofessional and uncalled for even if the other fellow was snarky. Hopefully he can act more decently in the future or I wont have anymore of his material in my collection.

The Guy had it coming. Can't believe the t-word is bad. Hahahaha. Matt should be able to defend himself against trolls.
 

If he wanted to defend himself against trolls (if that's even what you can call it), then the appropriate response is no response at all. By responding to a troll you acknowledge their presence and validate their opinion as a peer -- the better thing to do is just ignore them outright. Most people are smart enough to tell the difference and will make up their own minds without any rebuttal at all.

The snark was unnecessary, but his response was worse.
 


It's not a question of anyone being sensitive. It's a question of following board rules. Making a direct insult like that was a sure way to attract the banhammer.
 


MINOR SPOILERS


I'm prepping this adventure to run next week, and there's one thing I can't figure out. Maybe I'm just a dope, but I don't get how the information in the 'journals' on the last couple pages indicates the location of the individual glyphs.

As far as I can tell, there's no connection between the text of the journal entries and the placement of the glyphs in the cube. What am I missing?
 

Remove ads

Top