AbdulAlhazred
Legend
Yeah, 10 was sort of my "it can't be more than this! number", though headcount can tend to pile up. Still, I doubt they have super high overhead nor all $100k salaries either, so you could have 20 people realistically and still probably have PLENTY of cash flow. I'd be surprised if they had less than 5 people, but some of them may have other duties of course. They DID have a number of software guys for a while. DDI may not have ALWAYS been a cash cow, early on.Again, 10 full-time employees dedicated to DDI would surprise me, especially given that there are no apps in active development at the moment. I can see 10 if they were supporting an in-house software development team (and I've worked with teams smaller than that on application suite products), but right now they're sort of coasting on what's already been developed, and merely integrating content from the magazines. That's probably manageable with a couple full-time people, or some part-time work from an interdepartmental software team (WotC has their own software development people working on other IPs like M:tG).
We're looking at potentially a 6-digit sized user base by the time 5e rolls around. Heck, given that people aren't added to the group until they create a community account, it wouldn't surprise me if it were already 6-digits.
I look at it this way. At what time in D&D's history has anyone ever had the cashflow that they could coast for two years without producing new (as in not reprint) books? That's pretty difficult for any publishing company. I've always thought that it was the DDI that is letting WOTC take so long to bring out 5e.
Yeah, if you imagine it could be 6 digits users, and they seem to be able to run on no book sales you'd HAVE to assume that's at least partly a matter of having some nice cash flow. I'd certainly be QUITE happy to run DDI as a business, I'm sure it would be no problem at all to make a very nice return on that as it stands now. Even counting what they sunk into it, and that a bunch of money was wasted back in 2006-7 it would be hard to imagine bad overall numbers.