Not Impressive? Ranged? You're not playing Warlocks right. *cough*Clawlock*chough*
I'm unfamiliar with dragon magazine Warlock material, I'm going to have to look into this! Always good to learn new things about 3.5, thanks gents. (And this isn't even my thread!)Clawlock requires the Eldritch Claws feat from Dragon 358, so it might very well be off the table in this and other instances. If the feat is allowed then Clawlocks definitely rock when it comes to damage (especially with Beast Strike
I'm unfamiliar with dragon magazine Warlock material, I'm going to have to look into this! Always good to learn new things about 3.5, thanks gents. (And this isn't even my thread!)
I'm familiar with the Glavelock, it's the Clawlock that's new to me. Am I right in reading that the Clawlock is not based as a natural attack, but as an improved unarmed attack?Might wanna look into Eldritch Glaive from Dragon Magic too, then^^ Almost as good for damage dealing, and a lot less dangerous for your delicate Warlock HD.
I'm familiar with the Glavelock, it's the Clawlock that's new to me. Am I right in reading that the Clawlock is not based as a natural attack, but as an improved unarmed attack?
im of the opinion that beast claws doesn't do anything other than give you another way to add claw damage to an unarmed attack, it doesn't add double claw damage in anyway; either you attack with the claws and add unarmed damage, or you attack with unarmed strikes and get to add your claw (EB) damage (the better option because of possible iteratives)
On a successful attack with an eldritch claw, you deal your normal amount of unarmed strike damage plus your eldritch blast damage.