delericho
Legend
1. There's a saddle? If not, all his ride/control checks should be at disadvantage.
Note that this is a 3.5e thread. I spotted the "mounts must be willing rule" in the 5e PHB when I read through it recently.

1. There's a saddle? If not, all his ride/control checks should be at disadvantage.
Note that this is a 3.5e thread. I spotted the "mounts must be willing rule" in the 5e PHB when I read through it recently.![]()
Oops! But the thought still counts. I would definitely apply at least a -5 penalty to any checks for going bareback, and another -2 or more for no bridle. Or possibly the reverse. And if the animal is wild, unbroken, then effectively he's trying to break the animal on the spot. That's a pretty astonishing thing to do without magic.
It is a game, so I know reality only loosely applies, but the idea that an unbroken animal can be controlled that way (knees only) is laughable. A well trained animal with a skilled rider? No problem. An untrained, unwilling predator? Sorry. No. Magic would be needed. So yes, I would apply multiple penalties.