Mistwell
Crusty Old Meatwad
Laugh Mistwell laughed "with" this post.
I wasn't laughing in the post so who exactly are you laughing with?
I thought you were being sarcastic?
Laugh Mistwell laughed "with" this post.
I wasn't laughing in the post so who exactly are you laughing with?
Let's see ... the Tyranny of Dragons adventures are the least modular, but they do have a few set pieces you could reuse, including a ruined castle in a swamp, a mummy lord's tomb, a white dragon's iceberg lair, and a tower protected by a magic hedge maze.I guess part of the problem then is it's not terribly transparent what sort of "adventure chunks" are easily portable out of the AP into another campaign.
Have you not got a FLGS you could go to in order to browse through the books?I might spend $50 on a book that was explicitly a collection of locations, together with adventure hooks and maps, as long as I could see a detailed lists of what those locations are and judge whether they fit in my campaign.
Ooh! I didn't know about this.
Dungeons and Dragons. Serious Business.™I thought you were being sarcastic?
I point out that D&D is small fish to WotC compared to Magic, yes. But they're not either/or. It isn't "equal to CCGs or crap!" Something can be doing great sales and be a huge hit in its market and still not touch MtG. It's possible for 5e to be a runaway success that is better than any edition since the mythical heyday of 1983 and defying all expectations AND not to sell as much as Magic....
I don't see how this is hard to understand.OK, so it is big when you want it to be big and small when you want it to be small.
Fair enough.
I don't see how this is hard to understand.
D&D is big when compared to other RPGs but small when compared to other WotC products. D&D is selling amazing when you compare it with other recent editions of D&D, and when talking about the RPG industry D&D is doing huge. But when talking about hobby gaming in general D&D is small.
The movie Storks from last year made $180 million dollars in theatres.
If you compare that to other Warner Brothers films that year, like Fantastic Beasts or Batman vs Superman it's pathetic. But if you compare it to the grosses of smaller films or art house films it's a staggering sum of money.
Its OK, no one is saying that it is hard to understand. Mark Twain and statistics and all that jazz
I don't understand the point you're trying to make.
He's callin' you a liar, bro!
More seriously, it's not hard to grasp. 5e is selling, well enough that WotC and Hasbro seem to be pretty happy with it. Paizo can be happy, too, they have a smaller, but dedicated, market that will buy more products with more complexity. It's not like the person who gets tired of Pathfinder will automatically switch to D&D5, or vice versa. Hell, I play and run both, and have for two years now because they scratch different itches TOTALLY.
It's funny because some of the most die-hard PF players I know actually broke out into a conversation about finding new appeal with 5e (mind you, is being into the second hour of a combat between our 13th level characters and their CR 14 & 15 enemies). As the phrase goes, I wanted to check the sky for Ragnarok or Judgment Day.![]()