WotC Mike Mearls: "I Was Not Fired From D&D"

Screenshot 2025-02-03 at 1.08.07 PM.png

Back in 2019, Dungeons & Dragons designer Mike Mearls left the D&D team to work on Magic: the Gathering. This move happened shortly after a controversy regarding abuse allegation within the TTRPG industry and the way many people alleged that Mearls handled the complaints and investigation, with a common rumour being that he was moved from the D&D team in order to move him out of the spotlight. In this recent interview with D&D historian Ben Riggs, Mearls denies that this was the motivation for the move, stating that Wizards of the Coast was moving D&D in a direction he no longer wanted to work on, and that the opportunity came up to work on Magic: the Gathering.

Ben Riggs: Since you brought up X and your return to it, I’ll ask about your departure from it. For three years, people were like, "Mike Mearls was fired from D&D in some way, shape, or form." So—were you fired from D&D?

Mike Mearls: I was not fired from D&D. And, you know, I don’t want to go into too many details about everything that happened back then because it was, like—oh, you know what? That was four or five years ago. But no.

It was actually kind of interesting. And I wonder if part of my social media thing is that a lot of the people who really latched onto that and all this weird conspiracy theory—like, I don’t know—maybe they’re all on some other social network now? Or maybe it just isn’t as interesting if the guy isn’t working. But no, no—I left. And I don’t really want to get into it too much, and honestly, there aren’t really any great details. But I moved over to Magic: The Gathering. I had the chance to work on Magic.

I’d been working on some digital tools for D&D, and I—well, I know there was this thing where someone publicly said I was no longer working on D&D, and I was like—no, that never happened. I have no idea why that happened, but I’m not even going to touch that. But I was working on digital tools, and then the company was looking at, "What do we want to do with digital? What’s our next step forward?" I was in favor of a very DM-centric approach. Let’s make tools for DMs. We have D&D Beyond—that’s great for players—but I want tools that will make running D&D faster and easier for me. And, you know, it became a decision about which direction we wanted to go. The company didn’t want to go in that direction. So I was like, well, I’m not really interested in working on something that’s so far from what I want to work on. And that’s why I got the job offer to go work on Magic.

So that was not like, at no point—to be clear—if like a quarter of what people talked about had happened, I would not have kept my job. Like, I really even know what people think happened. But yeah—that was never even close to being on the table.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

I do not believe we would have seen the 2024 rules in their current state if Mearls worked on them.
Based on Mearls' design history I'm afraid this is pure "cope"/"the grass is greener"/"stuff I made up in my head is better than real stuff".

The 2024 rules might not have the same exact issues they have, but they'd have a bunch of other, different painful issues instead. Mearls was where the buck stopped for an awful lot of 2024's design mistakes or "issues" or however you want to describe them, and some of 4E's most significant design mistakes too (even though he didn't get on board there until late).

So think 2024 wouldn't be in the "current state" just is really "cope". The odds are it would be in an equally questionable (or worse) state, just a different one.

As is all the hilarious nonsense other people are posting about him "voluntarily leaving" D&D because he "didn't like the way it was going", which just happened to coincide with a scandal he was directly involved in and acted unprofessionally in. That's a big part of the problem here - he wasn't fired - but he should have been - or at least censured. Any normal person would have been. And that's assuming he didn't hand over the emails - but the fact that he inserted himself into the situation, rather than passing this one to legal and HR is demented. It's not responsible, it's not professional, and his words at the time weren't those things either.

It's also retcon/revisionism, because initially he didn't even leave D&D, he just got moved on to being in charge of the "multimedia"/IP side of things before sometime later being moved on to MtG, and this was all after he mysteriously vanished.
 

log in or register to remove this ad


Remove ads

Remove ads

Top