One could argue that compared to a Paladin most classes are bad
Rangers flaw is really that they don't scale from level 11 on.
Sounds like a reasonably good/fine Monk house rule to me. Sorcerer could probably get extra sorcery points by adding their CHA Modifier too.The Monk needs more ki. Just add their Wis modifier and it may be enough.
Sounds like a reasonably good/fine Monk house rule to me. Sorcerer could probably get extra sorcery points by adding their CHA Modifier too.
problem is 1-10 not 11+ as few people play those levels.
Both classes have 1d10 HD, half-casters and Extra attack.
But Extra features from Paladin are few categories better that Rangers even before level 10.
Lay on hands, Divine smite and Aura of Protection vs. Favored enemy, natural Explorer and primeval awareness?
Not even a contest.
Depends if all you care about is combat.
Ranger class features greatly beat Paladin class features in exploration and social.
ranger is better that paladin in exploration if you count on DM charity.
You have favored terrain. Outside of it, you are no better than a paladin(having same skills OFC)
Same goes for favored enemy.
There is a reason that ranger got most changes over the years in UA.