Halflings are a hoot. I love lucky and I love the standard tropes - good food, naps, pipe smoking, smack talk. Good times.Suddenly, in my other thread I am leaning towards a halfling now...![]()
Halflings are a hoot. I love lucky and I love the standard tropes - good food, naps, pipe smoking, smack talk. Good times.Suddenly, in my other thread I am leaning towards a halfling now...![]()
I'd go with a gnome bear (badger) totem barbarian for the sweet resistance to anything and advantage on DEX (danger sense) + Int, Wis, Cha saves ( Gnome Cunning)!In my other thread, 5E - Anyone want to help with a new character?
@vincegetorix is suggesting a barbarian for the character build. I am starting to like the idea of a halfling barbarian who insists on using heavy weapons and attacks recklessly to offer the disadvantage.
In my other thread, 5E - Anyone want to help with a new character?
@vincegetorix is suggesting a barbarian for the character build. I am starting to like the idea of a halfling barbarian who insists on using heavy weapons and attacks recklessly to offer the disadvantage.
Good point, but it wouldn't be a heavy weapon RAW.Not to be that guy, but deliberately hamstringing yourself for laffs can get old fast, depending on the party. Just two-hand a battleaxe. A d10 weapon with advantage is way better than d12 without.
It was worded that way. I agree that on a literal reading it is ambiguous, but given the implausibility of an hour of fighting or an hour of spellcasting as a test condition, it is unambiguously a separated list.That reads as a list to me. I think that if the intent was for it to be 1 hour of walking or any amount of fighting, casting spells, or similar adventuring activity, it would have been worded that way.
Only if you assume that the intent is for long rests to be plausible to disrupt with combat alone. I disagree that spellcasting for an hour is implausible - again, rituals and spells like find familiar with long casting times make it very plausible.It was worded that way. I agree that on a literal reading it is ambiguous, but given the implausibility of an hour of fighting or an hour of spellcasting as a test condition, it is unambiguously a separated list.
Good point, but it wouldn't be a heavy weapon RAW.
Luckily, our house-rule for the Versatile property is the weapon can have either the Finesse or Heavy property if wielded in both hands... so that will work! NICE!![]()