Unearthed Arcana Why UA Psionics are never going to work in 5e.

[Chaosmancer]

None of his 5 summaries involved my arguments as I stated them. All 5 had things that I did not say.

So it is the specifics of what he said, not the general idea of them that you disagree with,

I get you are a lawyer Max, but this isn't a court of law. We aren't that precise with our language every second of the day.

 

[JiffyPopTart]

2. The limiting factor can't be that it takes a long time to become a wizard because it has been established a PC can become a wizard in one day and this carries over to ALL potential wizards.

 

[Maxperson]

View attachment 121769

Sure. The multiclassing rules don't support that view. I never said that you have to use that rules and in fact said that if you don't, you can make it take a long time to learn to be a wizard.

Care to put up more of your wrong summaries now? I can show you your errors there as well if you really want me to.

 

[JiffyPopTart]

4. The limiting factor can't be that it is too expensive to become a wizard because all merchants and nobles could still afford to send their families to wizard school.

 

[Maxperson]

View attachment 121770

Never said all. And in fact I said in multiple posts that not all merchants would. Incorrect summary #2. We can do the hat trick if you want. Heck, even that post only says that it's the ones that have the funds.

Edit: never mind. You waste your time posting incorrect summaries and go ahead and think you've somehow proven me wrong. I have better things to do that repeat what you should already know.

 

[JiffyPopTart]

Sure. The multiclassing rules don't support that view. I never said that you have to use that rules and in fact said that if you don't, you can make it take a long time to learn to be a wizard.

So then, you agree that taking a long time to become a wizard is a limiter to keeping the number of wizards to sub-Eberron levels, then?

 

[Maxperson]

So it is the specifics of what he said, not the general idea of them that you disagree with,

I get you are a lawyer Max, but this isn't a court of law. We aren't that precise with our language every second of the day.

Then why do you always try to catch me with my language?

 

[Maxperson]

So then, you agree that taking a long time to become a wizard is a limiter to keeping the number of wizards to sub-Eberron levels, then?

You're back to focusing only on wizard. I've been saying spellcasters for pages. Sure, I respond as "wizard" to your wizard arguments a lot, but I also bring it back around fairly often. My position is about far more than just wizards.

 

[JiffyPopTart]

Never said all. And in fact I said in multiple posts that not all merchants would. Incorrect summary #2. We can do the hat trick if you want. Heck, even that post only says that it's the ones that have the funds.

So then, you agree that being expensive to become a wizard is a limiter to keeping the number of wizards to sub-Eberron levels, then?

 

[JiffyPopTart]

You're back to focusing only on wizard. I've been saying spellcasters for pages. Sure, I respond as "wizard" to your wizard arguments a lot, but I also bring it back around fairly often. My position is about far more than just wizards.

Then answer the question as is specifically pertains to wizards only.