D&D 5E Epic Monsters: Lucifer III, Lord of Hell

Lately in Epic Monsters we’ve seen him as he falls and after he fell, and now we consider him at the peak of his power: Lucifer, Lord of Hell!

Lately in Epic Monsters we’ve seen him as he falls and after he fell, and now we consider him at the peak of his power: Lucifer, Lord of Hell!


lucifer III lord of hell DnD 5e BANNER.jpg


All of the realm infernal suffers at the whims of the archfiend and he uses everything Hell can offer to wage war on Heaven and Earth, corrupting and slaying mortals and celestials alike. The Prince of Darkness is an entity of nigh unfathomable power and influence with an army of devils that number beyond count at his beck and call—any fool that dares challenge, parley, or even bear witness to the Lord of Hell is almost certainly doomed.

Design Notes: To handle the big, big, big baddest bad guy of them all, the gloves are coming off—I am unlikely to ever build anything more powerful for 5E than what follows, and any adventuring party going after him will need all the boons, all the artifacts and legendary magic items, and all the luck in the world to succeed. Plus some extra allies numbering in the thousands. This is the fallen angel but bigger, tougher to hit, more hit points (and hit points gained from traits), faster, harder to damage, able to see further, deals more necrotic damage, has unfettered magic at hand, an RP hook trait to lure foolish adventurers, higher damage output, more devastating soul sucking attack, a much higher DC and attack bonuses, another improvement on Change Shape, and finally some legendary actions (including a means to summon fiends in combat outside of gate). Let’s do the numbers! Without considering legendary actions the DMG lands the Lord of Hell at 29.833 and the Blog of Holding at a much higher 37.66. While that averages out to 33.7499, access to so many new minions and the ability to become any creature in the game merits a solid boost so his Challenge Rating is getting popped up to 35.

Lucifer III, Lord of Hell
Huge fiend, lawful evil
Armor Class 24 (natural armor)
Hit Points 290 (20d12+160)
Speed 90 ft., fly 200 ft. (hover)

STR
DEX
CON
INT
WIS
CHA
30 (+10)​
27 (+8)​
26 (+8)​
27 (+8)​
25 (+7)​
31 (+10)​

Saving Throws Con +18, Wis +16, Cha +19
Skills Insight +25, Intimidation +28, Perception +25, Persuasion +28, Sleight of Hand +26, Stealth +26
Damage Resistances acid, lightning, thunder; bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from magical weapons
Damage Immunities cold, fire, necrotic, poison; bludgeoning, piercing, and slashing from nonmagical weapons
Condition Immunities charmed, diseased, exhaustion, frightened, poisoned, prone
Senses darkvision 300 ft., truesight 120 ft., passive Perception 35
Languages all, telepathy 300 ft.
Challenge 35 (255,000 XP)

Corrupted. Lucifer’s natural and weapon attacks are magical. When he hits with a melee attack, he deals an extra 6d12 necrotic damage (included in the attack).

Infernal Tongue. It is impossible to tell when Lucifer is lying. Additionally, no matter what he says, magic that would determine if Lucifer is telling the truth indicates that he is being truthful, and magic cannot reveal his alignment.

Innate Spellcasting. Lucifer’s spellcasting ability is Charisma (spell save DC 27, +19 to hit with spell attacks). He can innately cast the following spells, requiring no material components:
Constant: detect magic, freedom of movement
At will: animate dead, bestow curse, black tentacles, charm monster, chill touch, create undead, death ward, detect evil and good, disintegrate, dispel evil and good, dispel magic, dominate monster, eyebite, hellish rebuke (as a 5th-level spell), improved invisibility, invisibility, finger of death, harm, mass suggestion, plane shift, produce flame, planar ally, suggestion, teleport, vampiric touch, wall of fire
3/day each: gate, incendiary cloud, imprisonment, time stop, weird, wish

King of Darkness. Lucifer can see normally in darkness, both magical and nonmagical.

Legendary Resistance (3/Day). If Lucifer fails a saving throw, he can choose to succeed instead.

Magic Resistance. Lucifer has advantage on saving throws against spells and other magical effects.

Regeneration. Lucifer regains 20 hit points at the start of his turn if he has at least 1 hit point.

Shadow Stealth. While in dim light or darkness, Lucifer can take the Hide action as a bonus action.

Unholy Boon. Lucifer can use his action to touch a creature, granting it infernal power in exchange for something precious to it. For the next 24 hours, each round the creature can roll 1d12 and add it to any ability check, attack roll, or saving throw it makes.


ACTIONS

Multiattack. Lucifer uses his Frightful Presence. He then makes three melee attacks or he uses Soulsucking Touch and makes two melee attacks.

Claw. Melee Weapon Attack: +19 to hit, reach 15 ft., one target. Hit: 28 (4d8+10) slashing damage plus 39 (6d12) necrotic damage. The target's hit point maximum is reduced by an amount equal to the necrotic damage taken, and Lucifer regains hit points equal to that amount. The reduction lasts until the target finishes a long rest. The target dies if this effect reduces its hit point maximum to 0. If a humanoid is slain in this way, a fiend (with a CR equal to its CR + 3 or its level + 2) rises from the corpse 1 minute later. If a deva, planetar, or solar is slain in this way, a new fallen angel rises from the corpse 1d4 minutes later.

Frightful Presence. Each creature of Lucifer's choice that is within 300 feet of him and aware of him must succeed on a DC 27 Wisdom saving throw or become frightened for 1 minute. A creature can repeat the saving throw at the end of each of its turns, ending the effect on itself on a success. If a creature's saving throw is successful or the effect ends for it, the creature is immune to Lucifer’s Frightful Presence for the next 24 hours.

Soulsucking Touch. Lucifer reaches out at a creature within 50 feet that he can see, drawing away its life force. The target makes a DC 27 Charisma saving throw or reduces its Intelligence, Wisdom, and Charisma scores by 1d8 (roll separately for each). On a failure by 5 or more, the target rolls d10s instead. The target dies if this reduces an ability score to 0. Otherwise, the reduction lasts until the target finishes a short or long rest. If a humanoid is slain in this way, a fiend (with a CR equal to its CR + 3 or its level +2) rises from the corpse 1 round later. If a deva, planetar, or solar is slain in this way, a new fallen angel rises from the corpse 1 minute later.

Change Shape. Lucifer magically polymorphs into any creature that has a challenge rating no higher than his own, or back into his true form. Lucifer reverts to his true form if he dies. Any equipment he is wearing or carrying is absorbed or borne by the new form (his choice).

In a new form, Lucifer retains his alignment, hit points, Hit Dice, ability to speak, proficiencies, Legendary Resistance, lair actions, and Intelligence, Wisdom, and Charisma scores, as well as this action. His statistics and capabilities are otherwise replaced by those of the new form, including any lair actions of that form.



LEGENDARY ACTIONS
Lucifer can take 3 legendary actions, choosing from the options below. Only one legendary action option can be used at a time and only at the end of another creature's turn. He regains spent legendary actions at the start of his turn.
  • Attack. Lucifer makes a melee attack.
  • Spell (Costs 2 Actions). Lucifer innately casts a spell.
  • Conjure Fiend (Costs 3 Actions). Lucifer summons a fiend of challenge rating 15 or lower, which appears in an unoccupied space that he can see within 90 feet. The fiend disappears when it drops to 0 hit points. It obeys any verbal commands that Lucifer issues to it (no action required by him). If he doesn't issue any commands to the fiend, it acts freely.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Mike Myler

Mike Myler

Azzy

ᚳᚣᚾᛖᚹᚢᛚᚠ
That is not "technically" true at all. The name "Lucifer" is most likely a mistaken translation, see: Lucifer Regardless, no where in the bible does it say his name changed when he fell. Kinda hard to do when he was never named Lucifer. Of course, in the old testament the term Satan (accuser or adversary) is a noun, not a Name: Satan

Oh, it gets even muddier than that. Much of the modern (and early modern) concept of Lucifer/The Devil is not very Biblical at all. Expanding on what you said, "satan" is the general term for an "accuser" or "adversary". The first few times we see a supernatural entity that is associated with the word "satan" are from Numbers 22 (where an Angel of Yawheh is described as a "satan") and in 1 Chronichles 21 describes a satan that is sent to cause a pestilent (the narrative also occurs in 2 Samuel 24 where the term "satan" is not used, and the entity is simply an "Angel of Yahweh"). I think it's in Job 1 that this gets escalated and one of the "sons of God" is referred to as "The Satan" (note the definite article), who then convinces God to torment Job as a test of faith (playing the role of a divine prosecutor). In Zechariah 3, The Satan reprises his role as a divine prosecutor. The idea of The Satan being an agent of evil that is opposed to God appeared later, during/after the exile in Persia.

"Lucifer" is a bit of an odd duck. For one, it isn't even a Hebrew word (it's Latin) and first appears in the Latin Vulgate's translation of Isaiah. The original Hebrew word that is translated as "lucifer" (note the lack of capitalization) is "heyel" (which means "shining one") and isn't so much of a proper noun that it is appellation. It is used in the phase "Oh, shining one, son of the morning" ("son of the morning" being a reference to the planet Venus, the morning star—hence the translation to Lucifer in the Latin Vulgate). It context, it is used to mock the king of Babylon forming a narrative of the king having been so great, but because of his hubris he has been brought low. It wasn't until the late 2nd century, that the early Christian scholar, Origen, reinterpreted this passage (and a similar passage in Ezekiel that dresses down the king of Tyre) as referring to a supernatural entity rather than the mortal kings that the eponymous prophets were actually mocking. Even then, it was only later that the word "lucifer" began to be used as a name for the Devil.

TL/DR: Lucifer wasn't always the devil you know.
 

log in or register to remove this ad

dave2008

Legend
Oh, it gets even muddier than that. Much of the modern (and early modern) concept of Lucifer/The Devil is not very Biblical at all. Expanding on what you said, "satan" is the general term for an "accuser" or "adversary". The first few times we see a supernatural entity that is associated with the word "satan" are from Numbers 22 (where an Angel of Yawheh is described as a "satan") and in 1 Chronichles 21 describes a satan that is sent to cause a pestilent (the narrative also occurs in 2 Samuel 24 where the term "satan" is not used, and the entity is simply an "Angel of Yahweh"). I think it's in Job 1 that this gets escalated and one of the "sons of God" is referred to as "The Satan" (note the definite article), who then convinces God to torment Job as a test of faith (playing the role of a divine prosecutor). In Zechariah 3, The Satan reprises his role as a divine prosecutor. The idea of The Satan being an agent of evil that is opposed to God appeared later, during/after the exile in Persia.

"Lucifer" is a bit of an odd duck. For one, it isn't even a Hebrew word (it's Latin) and first appears in the Latin Vulgate's translation of Isaiah. The original Hebrew word that is translated as "lucifer" (note the lack of capitalization) is "heyel" (which means "shining one") and isn't so much of a proper noun that it is appellation. It is used in the phase "Oh, shining one, son of the morning" ("son of the morning" being a reference to the planet Venus, the morning star—hence the translation to Lucifer in the Latin Vulgate). It context, it is used to mock the king of Babylon forming a narrative of the king having been so great, but because of his hubris he has been brought low. It wasn't until the late 2nd century, that the early Christian scholar, Origen, reinterpreted this passage (and a similar passage in Ezekiel that dresses down the king of Tyre) as referring to a supernatural entity rather than the mortal kings that the eponymous prophets were actually mocking. Even then, it was only later that the word "lucifer" began to be used as a name for the Devil.

TL/DR: Lucifer wasn't always the devil you know.
Yep, that was what I was referring to. Thanks for adding the detail!
 

Morrus

Well, that was fun
Staff member
Oh, it gets even muddier than that. Much of the modern (and early modern) concept of Lucifer/The Devil is not very Biblical at all. Expanding on what you said, "satan" is the general term for an "accuser" or "adversary". The first few times we see a supernatural entity that is associated with the word "satan" are from Numbers 22 (where an Angel of Yawheh is described as a "satan") and in 1 Chronichles 21 describes a satan that is sent to cause a pestilent (the narrative also occurs in 2 Samuel 24 where the term "satan" is not used, and the entity is simply an "Angel of Yahweh"). I think it's in Job 1 that this gets escalated and one of the "sons of God" is referred to as "The Satan" (note the definite article), who then convinces God to torment Job as a test of faith (playing the role of a divine prosecutor). In Zechariah 3, The Satan reprises his role as a divine prosecutor. The idea of The Satan being an agent of evil that is opposed to God appeared later, during/after the exile in Persia.

"Lucifer" is a bit of an odd duck. For one, it isn't even a Hebrew word (it's Latin) and first appears in the Latin Vulgate's translation of Isaiah. The original Hebrew word that is translated as "lucifer" (note the lack of capitalization) is "heyel" (which means "shining one") and isn't so much of a proper noun that it is appellation. It is used in the phase "Oh, shining one, son of the morning" ("son of the morning" being a reference to the planet Venus, the morning star—hence the translation to Lucifer in the Latin Vulgate). It context, it is used to mock the king of Babylon forming a narrative of the king having been so great, but because of his hubris he has been brought low. It wasn't until the late 2nd century, that the early Christian scholar, Origen, reinterpreted this passage (and a similar passage in Ezekiel that dresses down the king of Tyre) as referring to a supernatural entity rather than the mortal kings that the eponymous prophets were actually mocking. Even then, it was only later that the word "lucifer" began to be used as a name for the Devil.

TL/DR: Lucifer wasn't always the devil you know.
He's basically a pop culture figure now, like Dracula.
 

dave2008

Legend
That is...pretty offensive.
Imagining Elohim as a group of beings is fair, and in my own game I use the term to refer to the heavenly host as a whole, but this interpretation is...almost blatantly insulting.
Wow. Initial, looking over the stats, I was going to ask what was offensive and then I got to the description. I'm an atheist and pretty liberal when it comes to interpreting RL religions in a fantasy context and even I find that offensive.
 
Last edited:

doctorbadwolf

Heretic of The Seventh Circle
Wow. Initial, looking over the stats, I was going to ask what was offensive and then I got to the description. I'm an atheist and pretty liberal when it comes to interpreting RL religions in a fantasy context and even I find that offensive.
Yeah I don’t take offense lightly for religious stuff related to Christianity, but sweet sacrilege Batman!
 


doctorbadwolf

Heretic of The Seventh Circle
And suddenly we all get a tiny insight into what cultural appropriation feels like!
Yep.

Now if everyone who feels the offense of that statblock can try honestly to extrapolate and imagine reading that as a person whose faith has been used against them by the majority group as part of rhetoric to persecute and oppress them, we might have a greater general understanding of why cultural appropriation is considered so harmful to BIPOC and other marginalized groups.

I mean, a guy can hope,
 

dave2008

Legend
And suddenly we all get a tiny insight into what cultural appropriation feels like!
Yep, which is interesting as I am a staunch atheist, I thought I would be more calloused to this . I guess being raised in a judo-christian environment is enough for certain biases to seep into my subconscious. I generally have a pretty non-nonchalant attitude to the representation of mythological and religious figures in my fantasy. But this has made me re-think my stance (not so much on Abrahamic religions, but in general).
 

Asisreo

Patron Badass
When I introduce religious homebrew, I try to be tasteful about it, even if it's through Myths.

Honestly, I'm still not entirely sure what's wrong with the Elohim description. I've grown up with christianity all my life and I don't particularly see what's offensive about them. Maybe the language is a bit pointed but I honestly don't know what's so bad about it even as an allegory to YHWH.
 

Xethreau

Josh Gentry - Author, Minister in Training
I like the creativity behind the Pathfinder elohim above, but I think that--as a Lovecraftian parody of the god of Deism--it should go by a different name. The characteristics and powers of the creature don't seem to be the fruit of deep engagement with the source material.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top