This is just semantics.
The US and the UK are two countries separated by a common language.
This is just semantics.
Objective?Insouciant? Nonchalant? Fatalist? Deist?
What's a good word for someone interested in establishing and observing a situations progress, but not invested in a particular outcome?
“DM” and “Player” are not amongst those words though. Unless you’re seriously suggesting I’m misunderstanding some Americanisms?The US and the UK are two countries separated by a common language.
“DM” and “Player” are not amongst those words though. Unless you’re seriously suggesting I’m misunderstanding some Americanisms?
Well, OK then. I’ll leave you to it.
As long as it's the expensive, premium grade kibble, we should be happy.Well, OK then. I’ll leave you to it.
What's this 'when' and 'was' you speak of?I could (maybe) see it if the DM were an arbiter between two competing groups of player characters....but that was a relatively rare playstyle even when the game was about murderhobos and dungeon-heisting, let alone today.
Shouldn't that be Peak Pedantry?It's funny that this entire argument is resolved with capitalization.
A DM is playing the D&D game. They play a game, so they are a player.
The DM does not have a Player Character. So as DM, they are not a Player.
Is a DM a player? Yes. Is a DM a Player? No.
...I may have hit peak pedantry...