D&D 5E What kind of XP awards does your group currently use in 5E?

[el-remmen]

I divide the XPs required by a number of sessions and hand out the fraction at the end of each game. I stopped caring about XPs midway during 2e.

How do you determine X? X = number of sessions.

 

[Charlaquin]

Ah. I misunderstood.

What you describe makes a lot of sense. In my current game, however, I hadn't given it much thought because everyone is enjoying doing what we've been doing (facing encounters and completing quests). Role-playing is its own reward, though in the case of people who want to rp every single micro-interaction in character it feels like a punishment for everyone else.

For sure! I mean, session-based and story-based advancement work for tons of groups, so it’s not like you need an XP award structure to set the tone for your campaign. It is a powerful tool for doing so though, and again, human brains love watching progress bars fill up. So I prefer it.

 

[el-remmen]

I hated AD&D xp accounting as a DM. I did it, but there were times I fell behind a number of games and going over the encounters and figuring out the xp was an exercise I was happy to give up from 3e and on.

I loved it and still love it.

Back in 1E days I had an accountants ledger I used to keep track of XP. Now I use excel and I am not exaggerating that I LOVE making/using spreadsheets.

 

[Sacrosanct]

Depends on the group preference. Done milestone and done xp tracking. usually for xp tracking, it's awarded at the end of the session when the party has access to their next long rest.

 

[Sacrosanct]

I loved it and still love it.

Back in 1E days I had an accountants ledger I used to keep track of XP. Now I use excel and I am not exaggerating that I LOVE making/using spreadsheets.

View attachment 131200

Excel you say?

 

[TwoSix]

Every group I’ve played with does some version of story/session milestone leveling. Whenever there’s a break in the action after a few sessions, the DM will decide that you’ve leveled at the end of the session.

Honestly, outside of a specific game feel, like an OSR style, XP feels a little anachronistic. Level is more about deciding what tone and feel you want the game to run at, rewards for play are a lot more about magic items.

 

[el-remmen]

You’re using XP but not getting the benefits that are unique to XP.

I somehow missed this in the cross-posting. What are these unique benefits? They still get the bar filling up effect, just more spaced out making it more special when it happens. Getting XP is not guarantee of going up a level. Like I said, I have awarded XP six times and they're just shy of 5th level.

 

[Oofta]

I don't want to "encourage" players to do anything other than what they think what their PCs would do or what they have fun doing. If they're having fun with RP sessions instead of killing monsters, I don't want to influence that one way or another. So I use session based advancement (for the most part) which is something I discuss with the group ahead of time. How quickly do they want to advance?

I used to try to figure out XP for defeating obstacles and RP but I just found myself thinking in terms of how quickly I wanted them to advance. Doing session based just kind of cuts out the middle man. I mean, one of my PCs developed a nemesis who spread rumors about them. One of the people that believed the rumors was the only legit broker of magic items in town so they had to find an "alternative". It was quite fun until we got the nemesis issue resolved and everyone had a blast with it. But how much XP should I have rewarded? I have no clue.

I'd rather reward my players with things that have an impact on their PCs in game, not things that only impact the players or the meta-game.

 

[el-remmen]

What this thread has helped me to discover about myself so far, is that the complicated tabulations of XP are for my psychological benefit not the players, who could not care less (except maybe that one guy, but he isn't playing with us anymore, but not for that reason).

I'm okay with that.

 

[Charlaquin]

I somehow missed this in the cross-posting. What are these unique benefits? They still get the bar filling up effect, just more spaced out making it more special when it happens. Getting XP is not guarantee of going up a level. Like I said, I have awarded XP six times and they're just shy of 5th level.

Mainly, tying the filling of the progress bar directly to your in-game actions. Watching a progress bar fill up on its own is satisfying. Making a progress bar fill up is significantly more satisfying. If you award XP in batches and don’t specify what the players did to earn it, they get the former effect, but they don’t get the latter. And you can get the former from session-based advancement too.

A side-effect of tying XP awards to in-game actions is that it encourages the players to seek out more ways to perform the actions that they get XP for. They want to make the progress bar fill up, so they will actively try to do more of the thing that they know makes it fill up more. Now, to some, like @Oofta, this may be a negative side-effect (in which case, session-based advancement will probably be more appealing), whereas to me it’s a hugely positive one. As I pointed out in the other post, it is a powerful tool for setting the tone of a campaign.

In theory, story-based advancement ties progress to in-game behaviors, but doesn’t have the bar-filling element. In practice though, it tends to be pretty arbitrary which story-based achievements result in a level increase and which ones don’t. It is, in my opinion, the worst method for character advancement of the three, though it does require the least work on the DM’s part, which I believe is the main reason for its popularity.