doctorbadwolf
Heretic of The Seventh Circle
We can. No one cares if you use orcs as an evil unnatural fungus that grows in dark places and produces a mockery of true sentient life. Hell, few people will be upset if a published setting does so, especially if it also uses warforged as the natural world's response to that, creating champions whose purpose is to go out and find the corruption causing this strange blight and end it, or something interesting like that.Which is absolutely a valid way of playing the game. Other people just want simplistic good guys and bad.
Why can't we have both?
People who want to play orcs will be annoyed by it being orcs that are that thing, rather than a new type of monster called blightspawn or something, but whatever.
Absolutely nothing about the core books saying orcs can be any alignment, right in the playable writeup and the MM stat blocks, stops you from playing your way.
Do you even realise that you just said that categorizing two things differently based on literally any factors is arbitrary? Do you realise how completely absurd that is?Seems quite arbitrary to me to say that categorization is bad in some cases but not others.
Different cases aren't arbitrary, they're different because the components of them are different. A DnD Demon is a completely different kind of creature from any humanoid. More different than a dragon is from a human, if we want to bring more complexity into the comparison.
"Has offspring in a natural way, involving some kind of gestation and birth, with traits passed down from parent to offspring, and offspring then generally being raised by the older generation, with the ability to differ in opinions, priorities, values, and beliefs, from generation to generation and within a generational cohort, to build and improve upon that with others have built"
Is inherently different from,
"Is generated randomly from the elemental energy of the Abyss, existing only to destroy and consume and attain more power, with no inherent relationship to others except in the most general sense of being vaguely the same kind of creature or not and sharing the goal of universal cosmic annihilation or not."
There is nothing arbitrary about distinguishing between those two groupings.
That's privelege. Nothing wrong with having privelege, but willfully refusing to even consider hearing and understanding viewpoints that come from a lack of that privilege is not great.LOL as someone raised Mormon, I didn't default to that ever in my life.
I just see a fantasy race of elves. /shrug
No, I assure you Black Europeans, Afro-Latin folk, and many Indigenous folk, also see it quite clearly, not to mention Africans in African nations where white people have directly controlled and ruled over by force majority Black nations within living memory.Maybe it's just an American thing? I don't make these assumptions and associations.
They are evil, other elves are almost never drawn as anything but very white and are default-good. Only by willfully refusing to see the problem can someone possibly not see it.Drow are not onyx skinned because they are evil.
They are evil because they have an evil racial god.
No. The fetishization of Black women is not the same subject as the general objectification of women. It is a very specific problem, and is not just the product of a particular time, it is a pervasive and ongoing problem that persists today.If we wish to get into objectification of women in Fantasy art well that's been done, and it's a product of the timeframe in which it's foundations were established.
Privelege is very convenient.I see a fantasy race, and I don't associate it with reality.