Crimson Longinus
Legend
No they can't. Because 'druids will not wear metal armour' is a rule.And they can then change their minds with no repercussions except a possible DM hissyfit.
No they can't. Because 'druids will not wear metal armour' is a rule.And they can then change their minds with no repercussions except a possible DM hissyfit.
It's not really much. The class section where the proficiencies are in greater detail says what the rule is. Medium armor proficiency with some lore about not wearing metal armor. The page 45 chart is small and to save space they shorted "will not wear metal armor" to "non-metal," but a space saving paraphrase isn't going to trump the real thing that is on page 65.
No it is an actual rule literally printed in the book with actual letters. Just like every other rule.It's a personal rule of the PC, sure. Much like people making new years resolutions are making personal rules to do or not do something. Those rules can be broken by personal choice. Nothing prevents it.
The armor class doesn't really matter that much. It's all going to ultimately fall within a point or two of every other armor anyway. This isn't about cheesing the system, and as the sage advice says, it's not going to unbalance anything if the druid wears metal armor. It's simply about choice and theme.Would they? It requires +5 dex modifier to equal halfplate with +2 dex modifier. I have hard time seeing druids getting 20 in dex and with anything less you're better off with the halfplate.
Yep. Not ignoring any rule with the druid, though. The armor thing is a strong lore related preference, not a rule.I made no claims one way or another - except that: there it is for those that hadn't realized it.
Your interpretation is fine. You can choose to ignore whatever rules you like for any reason you like at your table.
Not in the PHB that I can see. Not in the Sage Advice unless the DM house rules in a consequence.No it is an actual rule literally printed in the book with actual letters. Just like every other rule.
So, to you, the table on page 45 is "not a rule"?Yep. Not ignoring any rule with the druid, though. The armor thing is a strong lore related preference, not a rule.
The problem is that the rule hearkens back to older AD&D style item prohibitions like "Magic Users can never wear armor" or "Cleric can only use Blunt Weapons"; those rules were problematic then and seem fundamentally atavistic in a modern game.'Druids will not wear metal armour' That is the rule! I literally cannot understand where the difficulty is. If your character has a rule 'Will not do X' then them doing X is against the rules. This must truly be the bizarrest attempt at rules lawyering I have ever seen; simply claiming that words don't mean things.![]()
You aren’t any more RAW on this than I am.If a player has their PC put on metal armor, I know that PC is not a druid no matter what their character sheet says because druids will not wear metal armor.
Feel free to ignore the rule from the PHB at your table.
Not in the PHB that I can see. Not in the Sage Advice unless the DM house rules in a consequence.
A rule. Not a suggestion, a rule. The consequence of not following is the same than me deciding to roll 2d12 for my attack rolls instead of d20, so likely people not wanting to play with me.PHB said:Armor: Light armor, medium armor, shields (druids will not wear armor or use shields made of metal)