gravity-defying appendices we see far too often!
I know what was intended here, but I got an image of someone slapping a couple of vestigial digestive organs onto the shoulders of a devil indicating the ability to fly....
gravity-defying appendices we see far too often!
(checks dictionary) Err, I see appendix doesn't mean what I thought it meant.![]()
Appendix N?(checks dictionary) Err, I see appendix doesn't mean what I thought it meant.![]()
If you tanked your Charisma it will show up in your personality even if you use disguise self. And if the partner cares only about HAWT and nothing about personality, well then they are getting what they desire.That's interesting. Society could also evolve to accept it. We don't have "no make-up zone" or "no dyed hair zone", after all. I guess it would depend on how blatant is the illusion effect.
If you tanked your Charisma it will show up in your personality even if you use disguise self. And if the partner cares only about HAWT and nothing about personality, well then they are getting what they desire.
"Beauty is only magic deep" -- Halruuan proverb.
I definitely think the lack of a double standard in Frazetta style S&S definitely is less jarring and gets less flak than seeing two hulking men in full plate and a girl in g-string standing between them - and they're all meant to be adventurers in the same setting. One that always bugs me is the depictions of women with heavy limb armour and near naked torsos, it's very difficult to think up even a high-magic explanation for how that could make any sense. And of course some art is too focused on sexual characteristics to work well for any non-porno genre, like that notorious Exalted cover.I prefer my cheesecake and beefcake to be available in equal measure, the level of which is almost irrelevant to me. If the men are only pictured gruffly in sensible attire, then the same should be true for the women (and the enbies). And vice-versa also applies. If I'm seeing half-naked women drawn for the male gaze, I'd better be seeing half-naked men drawn for the female gaze (and half naked sexy enbies for everyone!).
And obviously, the art should match the tone of the text. If it's lowkey and gritty, I don't expect to see flamboyant impractical outfits.
Nudity != sex, but nudity is frequently used as a shorthand for it, and in North American society, nudity is more taboo than violence, so I'm not surprised we don't see many examples of non-sexual nudity in modern media.
When I created a female Elf Cleric for a BFRPG game recently, I found a pic I liked for a portrait but it had this common issue of limb armour combined with bare torso, so I did some heavy cropping for her tokenI definitely think the lack of a double standard in Frazetta style S&S definitely is less jarring and gets less flak than seeing two hulking men in full plate and a girl in g-string standing between them - and they're all meant to be adventurers in the same setting. One that always bugs me is the depictions of women with heavy limb armour and near naked torsos, it's very difficult to think up even a high-magic explanation for how that could make any sense. And of course some art is too focused on sexual characteristics to work well for any non-porno genre, like that notorious Exalted cover.
I totally forgot about that cover! And now I can’t get it out of my head.And of course some art is too focused on sexual characteristics to work well for any non-porno genre, like that notorious Exalted cover.