I recently saw a musical analogy for my board game Britannia that made me think about a related analogy to explain opposed games versus puzzles, and further, RPGs. Let’s have a go.
I thought that was quite good, but how can we adapt something like that for RPGs? To understand this analogy it’s helpful to define what jazz is:
Improvisation is the key here, though improvisational music existed long before jazz. Ludwig von Beethoven, for example, before he became deaf, was a famous piano improviser. He just sat at the piano and started playing things that had not been previously composed, it just came out of his head to his hands. In recent times, John Bayless is one of the most well-known piano improvisors, although in my experience of listening he starts from a well-known piece.
In Baroque music there is some improvisation by the musicians, and there are "repeats" in classical compositions, where the conductor decides how often, and even when, a section is repeated. Yet classical music as a whole is very much a case of playing what's been written, with inevitable differences in interpretation. A composition can sound rather different depending on who plays it. So there is some element of improvisation but it is largely with a "dominant strategy".
This contrast can be seen in terms of risk, there's a greater risk of complete failure in an opposed game, that is, "falling on your face" as you attempt to improvise. The approved song list method is safer (and often easier to figure out), and often there's also a "generally accepted correct move in most situations," so it's hard to screw up. Other players may advise you of the accepted move, and some may even be annoyed if you don't make that move. Combine this with the regular progression upward of Euro games (compared with opposed games, where you can be torn down), and in general Euros are much less risky.
At the other end of the spectrum, where the RPG is a storytelling machine, the GM (or adventure module) creates a solution which the players must follow to succeed. They are playing from, at best, a very short list of approved songs (perhaps the GM has created more than one solution). The GM might be seen as the conductor of an orchestra. If players deviate, either the GM redirects them, or the music doesn't work (they don't succeed).
There are lots of possibilities in between, involving less and less improvisation and more and more direction as you go from the older play style to the storytelling style. Some sessions may be aimed at a story rather than a game, yet still involve improvisation among the players - players telling one another a collaborative story. RPGs are varied enough to accommodate all kinds of styles.
Your Turn: How much is your RPG experience like musical group improvisation?
A “Competitive Jazz Quartet”
On Boardgamegeek.com Nicholas Bamber said:I thought that was quite good, but how can we adapt something like that for RPGs? To understand this analogy it’s helpful to define what jazz is:
Improvisation is the key here, though improvisational music existed long before jazz. Ludwig von Beethoven, for example, before he became deaf, was a famous piano improviser. He just sat at the piano and started playing things that had not been previously composed, it just came out of his head to his hands. In recent times, John Bayless is one of the most well-known piano improvisors, although in my experience of listening he starts from a well-known piece.
In Baroque music there is some improvisation by the musicians, and there are "repeats" in classical compositions, where the conductor decides how often, and even when, a section is repeated. Yet classical music as a whole is very much a case of playing what's been written, with inevitable differences in interpretation. A composition can sound rather different depending on who plays it. So there is some element of improvisation but it is largely with a "dominant strategy".
The Song of the Game
People playing Eurostyle board games are playing one of several possible or allowed “songs,” if they know the "paths to victory" well enough. In other words, they're not succeeding in playing just any song, they have to play from the approved (by the designer of the game) short playlist. If they play some other song they can score points, but they won't have a decent chance to win. That's because the "multiple paths to victory" are solutions to the puzzle of the "game." There are no such always-correct solutions to an opposed game, not if well-designed. If badly designed there may be one solution only, the "dominant strategy", a no-no in game design.This contrast can be seen in terms of risk, there's a greater risk of complete failure in an opposed game, that is, "falling on your face" as you attempt to improvise. The approved song list method is safer (and often easier to figure out), and often there's also a "generally accepted correct move in most situations," so it's hard to screw up. Other players may advise you of the accepted move, and some may even be annoyed if you don't make that move. Combine this with the regular progression upward of Euro games (compared with opposed games, where you can be torn down), and in general Euros are much less risky.
Improvisation & RPGs
In the older (opposed game) play style of tabletop role-playing games, improvisation is typical. You try to find solutions to the situation you're presented with. The GM (or adventure module) sets up the situation, and doesn't try to figure out/impose a solution or solutions, let alone guide you to any particular solution. Failure is always possible. But if the players succeed, the result is something like a jazz session improvisation involving both players and GM. Experience makes a difference in both endeavors. Moreover, the GM may improvise much of the adventure. But that can also happen in storytelling.At the other end of the spectrum, where the RPG is a storytelling machine, the GM (or adventure module) creates a solution which the players must follow to succeed. They are playing from, at best, a very short list of approved songs (perhaps the GM has created more than one solution). The GM might be seen as the conductor of an orchestra. If players deviate, either the GM redirects them, or the music doesn't work (they don't succeed).
There are lots of possibilities in between, involving less and less improvisation and more and more direction as you go from the older play style to the storytelling style. Some sessions may be aimed at a story rather than a game, yet still involve improvisation among the players - players telling one another a collaborative story. RPGs are varied enough to accommodate all kinds of styles.
Your Turn: How much is your RPG experience like musical group improvisation?
