I asked you to leave the thread. You didn't. So now you'll be leaving the site for a few days. These things are not requests.Couldn't be arsed to google search.
Are Nazi's aresholes, sure.
I cannot find Holocaust denying journal thing to check....link?
It should be. One of the more disappointing things in recent years is how much it isn't.The whole 'this is just wokeness being unfair' diatribe we keep hearing kinda falls flat when we're talking about Nazi sympathizing. Isn't this the one thing we're all in agreement is genuinely terrible. Didn't we fight a war over it? I think pretty much the whole world was involved.
It should be. One of the more disappointing things in recent years is how much it isn't.
Not at all, for the sort of person described.writing an entire book as a prank seems a bit... much?
This seems a fortuitous typo.The two thugs fit seemlessly together
"C. S. Lewis wrote some Christian treatises, sure, but maybe he became a transcendtal Buddhist towards the end of his life. Who can say?"
According to Chirine, former archivist for the Tekumel Foundation, some members were aware of Barker's views well before he died. I can see no reason to doubt his account.It's not really the same thing, though. C.S. Lewis was known for his Christian writings and that was basically his entire public image; nobody knew about this until 10 years after Barker died.
This is like someone finding records of C.S. Lewis having secretly belonged to NAMBLA 20 years ago or something. There are possibly fringe interpretations that make it compatible with Christianity, but it's not the common thing and the vast, vast majority of Christians would find the idea horrifying. Did he stick with it? Did he join the journal and they just never took him off? (I know from my work with predatory journals it can be hard to get your name off their masthead.) Who knows?
Yeah, it seems he was smart wnough to keep it on the downlow, but people knew...It's not really the same thing, though. C.S. Lewis was known for his Christian writings and that was basically his entire public image; nobody knew about this until 10 years after Barker died.
This is like someone finding records of C.S. Lewis having secretly belonged to NAMBLA 20 years ago or something. There are possibly fringe interpretations that make it compatible with Christianity, but it's not the common thing and the vast, vast majority of Christians would find the idea horrifying. Did he stick with it? Did he join the journal and they just never took him off? (I know from my work with predatory journals it can be hard to get your name off their masthead.) Who knows?