Blue
Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal
There was no attempt to limit a discussion - that was the discussion that was being had: can the rules handle it. You are attempting to expand the discussion with points beyond the rules, which are not relevant for the discussion.I disagree. Attempting to limit discussion about how 5e avoids part of a specific & well known 3.5 problem to exclude mention of how it preserves the other half of that very same problem pretty much spotlights how severe the problem is.
It's like if there was a discussion if horses or bicycles were faster over long distances, and you insist on talking about trains. Keeping something on-topic is acceptable.