Greg Benage
Legend
We call it an elf-game, anyway, we just need to brand Elf.
"What kind of Elf are you playing?"
"I'm a dwarf."
Done.
"What kind of Elf are you playing?"
"I'm a dwarf."
Done.
We call it an elf-game, anyway, we just need to brand Elf.
"What kind of Elf are you playing?"
"I'm a dwarf."
Done.
Depends what you mean by stats, I guess? You get features from it, but no ability score changes. Specifically, either the exact same features you would get from being a centaur, or the exact same features you would get from being a Triton.But you get stats related to that correct?
Neither of us have meaningful data on how many players are using such options, but I doubt WotC would have explicitly included the option in the playtest if they didn’t have reason to think the majority of their players would want such an option.By rest you mean a small subset.
For the most part, members of a species can't successfully reproduce outside their species, so using the term to replace "race" doesn't really work, given that we have - at the very least - half-orcs and half-eves being common enough to list as their own "race" in 5E. I prefer it to "race", though.
Depends what you mean by stats, I guess? You get features from it, but no ability score changes. Specifically, either the exact same features you would get from being a centaur, or the exact same features you would get from being a Triton.
It’s a completely made-up term, coined right here on ENWorld in one of these conversations, half-jokingly, because any real English word will have connotations someone might object to. Making up a new word specifically for the character feature formerly known as racket is, as the thinking goes, the only way to give it a totally inoffensive designation.I am unfamiliar with the "shmorp". Can someone explain this term, where it comes from, and how it is relevant to D&D?
“Kind” is doing the real lifting there.We call it an elf-game, anyway, we just need to brand Elf.
"What kind of Elf are you playing?"
"I'm a dwarf."
Done.