D&D (2024) What new jargon do you want to replace "Race"?

What new jargon do you want to replace "Race"?

  • Species

    Votes: 60 33.5%
  • Type

    Votes: 10 5.6%
  • Form

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • Lifeform

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • Biology

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Taxonomy

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Taxon

    Votes: 2 1.1%
  • Genus

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Geneology

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Family

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Parentage

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • Ancestry

    Votes: 100 55.9%
  • Bloodline

    Votes: 13 7.3%
  • Line

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Lineage

    Votes: 49 27.4%
  • Pedigree

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Folk

    Votes: 34 19.0%
  • Kindred

    Votes: 18 10.1%
  • Kind

    Votes: 16 8.9%
  • Kin

    Votes: 36 20.1%
  • Kinfolk

    Votes: 9 5.0%
  • Filiation

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Extraction

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Descent

    Votes: 5 2.8%
  • Origin

    Votes: 36 20.1%
  • Heredity

    Votes: 3 1.7%
  • Heritage

    Votes: 48 26.8%
  • People

    Votes: 11 6.1%
  • Nature

    Votes: 1 0.6%
  • Birth

    Votes: 0 0.0%


log in or register to remove this ad

We call it an elf-game, anyway, we just need to brand Elf.

"What kind of Elf are you playing?"

"I'm a dwarf."

Done.

"Choose your Elfness from among Aasimar, Ardling, Dragonborn, Dwarf, Elf, Genasi, Goliath, Halfling, Human, or Tiefling, or brew a custom Elfness from the table on the next page."
 

If the term Shmorp fuses the concepts of culture and species in the same way that racism does, how would it help avoid racism?
 

For the most part, members of a species can't successfully reproduce outside their species, so using the term to replace "race" doesn't really work, given that we have - at the very least - half-orcs and half-eves being common enough to list as their own "race" in 5E. I prefer it to "race", though.
 
Last edited:

But you get stats related to that correct?
Depends what you mean by stats, I guess? You get features from it, but no ability score changes. Specifically, either the exact same features you would get from being a centaur, or the exact same features you would get from being a Triton.
 

By rest you mean a small subset.
Neither of us have meaningful data on how many players are using such options, but I doubt WotC would have explicitly included the option in the playtest if they didn’t have reason to think the majority of their players would want such an option.
 

For the most part, members of a species can't successfully reproduce outside their species, so using the term to replace "race" doesn't really work, given that we have - at the very least - half-orcs and half-eves being common enough to list as their own "race" in 5E. I prefer it to "race", though.

Which is the way it has been in D&D (you only had half-elves and half-orcs, much like Ligers are odd exceptions), none of the other races produced offspring at all if they mixed. Race meant species in D&D originally, as in the human race, distinct from other races and animals.
 

Depends what you mean by stats, I guess? You get features from it, but no ability score changes. Specifically, either the exact same features you would get from being a centaur, or the exact same features you would get from being a Triton.

What I am trying to figure out is if 'feature' here translates into any mechanical ability, bonus, or stat difference (or if it is purely superficial).
 

I am unfamiliar with the "shmorp". Can someone explain this term, where it comes from, and how it is relevant to D&D?
It’s a completely made-up term, coined right here on ENWorld in one of these conversations, half-jokingly, because any real English word will have connotations someone might object to. Making up a new word specifically for the character feature formerly known as racket is, as the thinking goes, the only way to give it a totally inoffensive designation.
 


Remove ads

Top