If the content in your book, requires that creator to actively do a thing to relicense under ORC or CC or whatever for you to use it again, I don't see how it doesn't blow a huge planet sized hole in a ton stuff.
What sort of scenario are you worried about?
Suppose that W(otC) licenses to A who produces a work containing OGC X that is derivative of W's OGC and also OGC Y that is not derivative of W's OGC..
Suppose further, purely for the sake of argument, that W successfully ends the licence in respect of their OGC.
Finally, suppose that B now wishes to publish a work containing X and/or Y. If they publish X, they may be infringing W's copyright, and they have no licence from W. So they would be relying on a sub-license from A. Given the supposition in the previous paragraph, A may lack such a power.
On the other hand, if B publishes Y then they have a licence from A to do so, set out (using the text of the OGL) in A's work.
I don't see that there is any need for A to relicense. That seems unnecessary in respect of Y, and ineffective in respect of X given that W has not agreed to any other licence regime.