Not officially.Didn't they do this a few weeks ago? Not being facetious. Serious question.
There have been multiple fresh takes since the late 1970s. People seem less and less interested. The most diversity people seem to be shooting for nowadays is what edition of D&D is you fantasy game looking to emulate or pay tribute to.The hobby so needs a fresh take on fantasy rpgs.
We can't get perfect market penetration figures for then or now, but I would bet a higher percentage of fantasy gamers are playing not-D&D now than when, say, RuneQuest was in its heyday.There have been multiple fresh takes since the late 1970s. People seem less and less interested. The most diversity people seem to be shooting for nowadays is what edition of D&D is you fantasy game looking to emulate or pay tribute to.
opengamingnetwork.com
I own zero MCDM stuff (sorry, Matt!), but his DM advice videos are fantastic. I binged them all earlier in the pandemic and it was an excellent use of my time.Hey, I'd barely followed Matt Colville over the years. But this is a great video. His passion about the emerging details (armor/movement/cinematic/tactical) is effervescent!
Can't be a coincidence that he ran a 4E campaign last year and that his newest 5E monster book is heavily 4E-influenced.I like to describe this game (unofficially titled 'Inevitable") as "D&D 4E minus the D&D".
I think it depends heavily on what not D&D is defined as. The OSR and Pathfinder are D&D so I'm not so sure about that.We can't get perfect market penetration figures for then or now, but I would bet a higher percentage of fantasy gamers are playing not-D&D now than when, say, RuneQuest was in its heyday.

(Dungeons & Dragons)
Rulebook featuring "high magic" options, including a host of new spells.