WotC Anyone Else Tired of the Wizards Bashing?

[Raiztt]

Hungry.

Fortunately, the conditions of "hungry" and "thief" are not mutually exclusive.

 

[Vaalingrade]

Fortunately, the conditions of "hungry" and "thief" are not mutually exclusive.

And this definition of 'thief' is outrageously off-kilter.

 

[Aldarc]

Now you sound like a Magic player.

Would you care to explain that or would doing so break forum rules for making things personal?

 

[mamba]

"Possession of a mislabeled purchase" isn't a crime. You seem to want this to be wrong, but can't define what the actual problem is.

I not once said it is a crime, in fact I said the opposite in a reply to one of your posts recently... not sure why you keep insisting on repeating the same stuff over and over, when it is clear (or at least should be) that this is not what I am saying, at all

If this were a corporation you didn't have any feelings for, one way or another, say a sneaker company that only sells shoes in Australia, do you think you'd be this sure the customer who got a pair of Platypus 2k3s a month early, when he'd purchased a pair of Koala Hightops, was the bad guy?

I got news for you, I do not care about WotC either. Yes, that guy still is an idiot for what he did and I still see nothing wrong with what happened to him.

 

[FitzTheRuke]

So everyone who gets the wrong Doordash and just eats it rater than deal with the horrendous chat support is a thief?

I mean, yes? Essentially. They can justify it all they like, and most people will give them a pass... but it's a pretty simple calculation: Did they take something that wasn't theirs? Yes.

 

[Raiztt]

And this definition of 'thief' is outrageously off-kilter.

A thief is someone who takes (or consumes) something that is not legally theirs. How is that off-kilter?

 

[LeviKornelsen]

at a minimum he does not own the product, because he never bought it

The FTC disagrees with you. If he bought them from a retailer, then he bought them. If he was shipped them in error, then he still owns them.

What To Do if You’re Billed for Things You Never Got, or You Get Unordered Products

Billed for products you never ordered, or for products you ordered but never got? Federal laws protect you. Here's what to do.

consumer.ftc.gov

Notably, these rules exist in order to prevent "I ship you something you didn't order, then bill you" scams, but they apply anyway.

Inventory and shipping errors are the problem of the shipper, not the receiver, in basically all cases.

 

[mamba]

And this definition of 'thief' is outrageously off-kilter.

pretty sure the law would agree however

 

[Vaalingrade]

I mean, yes? Essentially. They can justify it all they like, and most people will give them a pass... but it's a pretty simple calculation: Did they take something that wasn't theirs? Yes.

Something they were given in exchange for legal tender.

 

[Raiztt]

The FTC disagrees with you. If he bought them from a retailer, then he bought them. If he was shipped them in error, then he still owns them.

What To Do if You’re Billed for Things You Never Got, or You Get Unordered Products

Billed for products you never ordered, or for products you ordered but never got? Federal laws protect you. Here's what to do.

consumer.ftc.gov

Notably, these rules exist in order to prevent "I ship you something you didn't order, then bill you" scams, but they apply anyway.

Inventory and shipping errors are the problem of the shipper, not the receiver, in basically all cases.

Well, that wraps this up pretty nicely then.