Unpopular opinions go here

[Nikosandros]

Anything more complicated than Zork is a waste of time.

Colossal Cave Adventure was perfect. It all went downhill from there.

 

[James Gasik]

At least let us have Wizardry or Bard's Tale! I'd say Ultima, but I consider Ultima V to be the pinnacle of achievement, and quite a bit in the future (many were the hours I'd spend blundering across Britannia on my Commodore).

 

[Lanefan]

See, that's logical in the real world, where the gods are... not actually active and don't grant spells. But in a fantasy world, where the gods are active, I don't think it's actually realistic. Why would you have so many gods who just stick in their own little part of the world and never try to expand? Why have so many gods who are in charge of the same thing?

What might be more realistic is a "masks of god" thing: one set of gods, each of which is worshiped under different names in different areas.

Your "masks of gods" is pretty much what I have underneath it all, but the setting inhabitants* don't have a clue about it and thus at that level each culture etc. has its own bespoke pantheon.

* - other than maybe a dozen who have learned better, some firsthand.

 

[Lanefan]

Colossal Cave Adventure was perfect. It all went downhill from there.

Colossal Cave (or Advent) rocked, but I'm fine with a bit of development beyond that.

Zork, Rogue, Nethack, Larn, Dungeon Crawl, Pixel Dungeon and its many offshoots - gimme gimme gimme!

Anything much beyond that? Nah - all the graphics, sound, etc. just get in the way.

 

[DammitVictor]

The best value in my Steam library by far is Stardew Valley. I bought it for $12 a few years ago, and I've played it for 2,210 hours (and counting), so it breaks down to about half a penny per hour.

For me, it's Jupiter Hell. I don't know many hours I have on it officially, but they don't count the hours I've spent on beta testing or on my GOG copy. I've purchased 12 copies of the game and I'm still very happy with every penny.

Street Fighter 6 is getting there for me.

 

[Reynard]

You and your group are not representative of anything broader so you can't seriously expect the industry to consider your preferences.

 

[overgeeked]

The perfect game for your table is the one you design yourselves.

 

[aramis erak]

View attachment 291542

I'll quibble on the numbering, and the count, but not the core idea. I don't feel BECMI to Cyclo/Wrath is really a significant change in mechanics, merely in presentation.
Also, Troy Denning's Big Black Box Basic is missing; it's the Cyclo basic. It's the bit that makes Cyclo a different ed, as it's the basic for use with Cyclo.

It's also missing that there are at least 3 hidden subeditions of AD&D 1e, where noteworthy changes were made but not called out. Such as certain printings of AD&D 1E DMG note Dwarven Clerics as NPCs are allowed, while others do not. Similar some other changes that make for significant world building changes.

4E to Essentials really isn't a whole number, either.
3.0 to 3.5? sub-edition.

Oh, and the guy shorts Cook credit for Blue Expert, and by total omission, Troy Denning for the Big Black Basic, which seems to have had multiple different versions, differing in which adventure.

Likewise, AD&D 1E has a major overhaul with the release of Unearthed Arcana, and the changes to maximum levels, multi-classes, Adding the Cavalier class, and changing what class Paladins are a subclass of. The only reason UA isn't a AD&D 1.5 is because they were too cheap to remaster the PHB and do an edition churn.

Oh, and whitebox without sups is a VERY different game from with them.

1.0 OE no supps
1.1 OE with sups 1&2
2.0 Holmes Basic
3.0 AD&D 1E
3.1 AD&D 1E+ Unearthed Arcana
4.0 Moldvay Basic, Cook Expert
4.1 Mentzer Basic/Expert/Companion/Master/Immortal
4.2 BECMI + Gaz
4.3 BECMI + HW
5.0 AD&D 2E
5.1 AD&D 2E+core class splatbooks (due to all the kits)
6.0 Players Option & DM's Option. Oh, and the PO compatible ravenloft...
4.6 Denning Basic & Alston Cyclopedia, Alston Wrath of the Immortals - mostly presentation, but some additional bits. Not enough to separate the Gaz and HWR changes
7.0 D&D 3E
7.1 D&D 3E with first year errata
7.5 D&D 3.5e
8.0 D&D 4e
8.1 D&D 4e Essentials
9.0 D&D Next Playtests - different enough to be a different (and inferior) edition
10.0 D&D 5e Release
10.1 D&D 5e + Tasha's Cauldron
11.0 D&D one playtests

11 major editions, 22 counting major and minor.
My criteria? Major: a glance at the data blocks is sufficient to ID it.
Minor: you can tell in play, but not always from the character sheet. Classes with major operational changes.

And that's ignoring the hybrid wonkinesses of ...
1.1 Empire of the Petal Throne 1e (licensed variant of OE)
Adding the DragonLance Adventures, Greyhawk Adventures, and/or Oriental Adventures are pretty much additional subeditions of AD&D each, let alone combining them...
Similarly the Council of Wyrms, Ravenloft, Dark Sun, SpellJammer, or Birthright settings to 2E - as each changes character gen somewhat and play a good bit. BR and CoW are instantly detectable, Dark Sun has very different PC numbers, and different coins,

So, really, there are 25+ official variants. I don't know the other AD&D 2E settings to judge minor or trivial.
Oh, and BECMI/Hollow world? It makes many more fun oddities that can be "Hey, wait, WTF?"

 

[deganawida]

As hard as I’ve bounced off 5e the last 2 years, I am not 100% certain that the main reason for some people’s problems with it aren’t due to trying to include every optional rule, which are not clearly delineated as optional, such as backgrounds, feats, and skills. Remove those, and the game becomes more deadly.

I put myself in the category of those who want to include them. Too distracted by the shiny at times to really make the hard decisions.

 

[Whizbang Dustyboots]

As hard as I’ve bounced off 5e the last 2 years, I am not 100% certain that the main reason for some people’s problems with it aren’t due to trying to include every optional rule, which are not clearly delineated as optional, such as backgrounds, feats, and skills. Remove those, and the game becomes more deadly.

I put myself in the category of those who want to include them. Too distracted by the shiny at times to really make the hard decisions.

Having recently started a new 5E campaign, I was reminded how empowering it is to get out the machete and start cutting away anything that doesn't fit into a campaign. Yeah, you could have everything in the books in a setting (I run a Ptolus campaign that does, for instance), but much of the time, campaigns are improved by having focus.

Having a lot of optional stuff is very empowering in that regard, because once you start chopping the other stuff away, you can end up with something nicely customized for the kind of game you want to play.