21st May 2024 is the official release date!
Update--WotC has taken down the promo image and replaced it with one without a release date. See more here.
I'm not sure that I agree. You pay A LOT for the "empty space" and the "four corners" in a box. More than you do for more pages in a HC.The hardcover book format was fundamentally a mistake, they should have stuck with game boxes.
The big difference to me would seem to be 10 years versus 4. The revision seems overly hasty.Paizo, of course, did the WotC "the new edition is backwards compatible" dance and much like 5e, a number of people are calling it 2.5 due to the changes.
I'm not 100% sure that I agree, but it seems more reasonable than multiplying Core books.I'm not sure that I agree. You pay A LOT for the "empty space" and the "four corners" in a box. More than you do for more pages in a HC.
Either way, it's not what they've decided to do. Traditional 3 core. This time thickened up a bit. Splat books for whatever else. I mean, I get it. It works, so why mess with it?I'm not 100% sure that I agree, but it seems more reasonable than multiplying Core books.
In the 80s and 90s, putting D&D stuff in a box seems to have typically increased the price by $3.00.I'm not sure that I agree. You pay A LOT for the "empty space" and the "four corners" in a box. More than you do for more pages in a HC.
Cute facts, sincerely. However, I was talking about now and referring to how much they'd pass on to the consumer if they made boxed sets now. (Barring loss leaders like the Starter Sets, of course.)In the 80s and 90s, putting D&D stuff in a box seems to have typically increased the price by $3.00.
1986
AC9: Creature Catalogue (96 page book): $12.00
Immortal Rules (32/64 page books in a box): $15.00
1990
FOR1: Draconomicon (128 page book): $15.00
The Horde (64/64 page books in a box): $18.00
By 1990, that $3.00 also got you four maps, four monster sheets and two dozen cards, so there's that plus the fact that TSR's product pricing model during the 90s can hardly be described as "solid".
It's too bad the 4e Essentials didn't do better*, because I quite liked that format.Either way, it's not what they've decided to do. Traditional 3 core. This time thickened up a bit. Splat books for whatever else. I mean, I get it. It works, so why mess with it?
maybe not.Yep. Not just tradition, though. If they tried to make 4 core 2024 books rather than 3, the number of people who would rush to the internet to scream money grab would skyrocket. The pushback would be intense.
Well no they were not forced into it. It was their choice to change the game away from the OGL out of fear it would change, which didn't end up happening, but they still didn't wish to risk it in the future.yes, but they were forced into it by the OGL debacle, otherwise it would not have come this soon. A remaster would have come, but probably 3 or 4 years down the line, shedding the OGL forced them to do so now
Of course there would be. You'd be paying about the same price as two books of 450. Plus two more books the same price. A whole lot of people would view it as a money grab.maybe not.
depending on page count and quality.
if you get 2 books with combined page count of 700 instead of one of 450, there would not be a lot of pushback.