• The VOIDRUNNER'S CODEX is coming! Explore new worlds, fight oppressive empires, fend off fearsome aliens, and wield deadly psionics with this comprehensive boxed set expansion for 5E and A5E!

D&D (2024) Here's The New 2024 Player's Handbook Wizard Art

WotC says art is not final.

Status
Not open for further replies.
GJStLauacAIRfOl.jpeg
 

log in or register to remove this ad


log in or register to remove this ad




Mistwell

Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
I did not get the impression that just because it was a thing a wizard COULD do that it therefore had to be common to the class. Hence why I brought up the bladesinger wizard wielding a sword, something that is possible, but not common per se.
It was not you I was replying to. Para said, "But I'm guessing the reason it is floating is that she is a wizard." Floating staves are no more or less common for wizards than for any other spellcasting class, as it's just not a common thing any class does. It's certainly not specific to "wizard." It doesn't make much sense for the wizard given the staff appears to be the source of the spell, and wizards who use a staff as a source of the spell need to have it in one hand to do so.
 

Mistwell

Crusty Old Meatwad (he/him)
Perhaps its a new 1st level spell in 2024 D&D: Tenser's Floating Staff.
Yeah it's possible and I hope that (like a cantrip to make your spell focus float near you without need for it to take up a hand slot), or a common magic item of floating staff that can still be used as a component for a spell, are the explanation.
 

MNblockhead

A Title Much Cooler Than Anything on the Old Site
Yeah it's possible and I hope that (like a cantrip to make your spell focus float near you without need for it to take up a hand slot), or a common magic item of floating staff that can still be used as a component for a spell, are the explanation.
While I was being tongue-in-cheek, that would be a cool utility spell. But I think it should be first-level, not a cantrip. There should be a spell-slot cost to free both hands.
 

Do I want to be nearsighted? No. Do I really care? Not really.

Do I think being nearsighted is an ideal of beauty? No.

Do I want to cause my kids to be nearsighted because that would please other people who are frustrated with beauty? That would be child abuse.
It would be child abuse to bring up your children to care about soul destroying and transient things like physical beauty.

Meanwhile, in a world where anyone can look any way they like thanks to a 1st level spell, no one cares.
 


Hussar

Legend

Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Remove ads

Top