D&D General Wotc disclaimer in old books does not appear in DM's Guild mobile page

[Igor Mendonça]

(Sorry, I have made a mistake when I posted this thread).

The mobile page of DM's Guild, for some reason, does not show Wotc disclaimers regarding older book potential offensive contents (see above).

I thought there was another problem as well, but turns out that one was on me.

 

[Warpiglet-7]

Wait...



Dungeon Masters Guild - Planescape Campaign Setting (2e) Reviews

WTF was that??

Looks like Randall posted some customer comments! Talking. About self in 3rd person no less

 

[bedir than]

It's someone demanding the removal of Wizards recognizing the problematic history of D&D.

 

[Distracted DM]

I don't understand.. anything here, really. Can someone clarify thoroughly?

 

[aco175]

I love it when we start new threads and think everyone else knows where and what you split the topic from. Almost as much as not writing out the name of the book the first time you want to start using abbreviations for it.

 

[Sir Brennen]

I don't understand.. anything here, really. Can someone clarify thoroughly?

He's talking about this on the actual product description, which is standard for all the older stuff reprints, and is triggering for certain ... people:

We (Wizards) recognize that some of the legacy content available on this website does not reflect the values of the Dungeons & Dragons franchise today. Some older content may reflect ethnic, racial, and gender prejudice that were commonplace in American society at that time. These depictions were wrong then and are wrong today. This content is presented as it was originally created, because to do otherwise would be the same as claiming these prejudices never existed. Dungeons & Dragons teaches that diversity is a strength, and we strive to make our D&D products as welcoming and inclusive as possible. This part of our work will never end.

The last sentence should probably be clear indication to Randall that his request will not be granted.

 

[jayoungr]

I'm more interested in "Randall's" own disclaimer. Why should any of us care whether he plays 5E or not?

 

[EzekielRaiden]

I'm more interested in "Randall's" own disclaimer. Why should any of us care whether he plays 5E or not?

He has to stick it to The Man by showing his contempt for The System and its perfectly ordinary request for respect enforced thought-control, don'tchaknow.

 

[Vaalingrade]

Can we instead add to it and say 'some content is not appropriate for certain Randalls'.

 

[Nikosandros]

What is the Deal With All the random Capitalization?