D&D (2024) Wizards of the Coast Backtracks on D&D Beyond and 2014 Content

457249269_918504900314811_875922287646718169_n.jpg

Wizards of the Coast posted an overnight update stating that they are not going forward with previously released plans to require those wishing to use some 2014 content on D&D Beyond to use the Homebrew function to manually enter it. Instead, all the content including spells and magic items will be included. From the update:


Last week we released a Changelog detailing how players would experience the 2024 Core Rulebooks on D&D Beyond. We heard your feedback loud and clear and thank you for speaking up.

Our excitement around the 2024 Core Rulebooks led us to view these planned updates as welcome improvements and free upgrades to existing content. We misjudged the impact of this change, and we agree that you should be free to choose your own way to play. Taking your feedback to heart, here’s what we’re going to do:

Players who only have access to the 2014 Player’s Handbook will maintain their character options, spells, and magical items in their character sheets. Players with access to the 2024 and 2014 digital Player’s Handbooks can select from both sources when creating new characters. Players will not need to rely on Homebrew to use their 2014 player options, including spells and magic items, as recommended in previous changelogs.

Please Note:

Players will continue to have access to their free, shared, and purchased items on D&D Beyond, with the ability to use previously acquired player options when creating characters and using character sheets.

We are not changing players’ current character sheets, except for relabeling and renaming. Examples include Races to Species, Inspiration to Heroic Inspiration, and Cast Spell to Magic.

We’re dedicated to making D&D Beyond the ultimate digital toolset for Dungeons & Dragons, continuously enhancing the platform to ensure you can create, customize, and play your game just as you envision it. From your first one-shot to multi-year campaigns and everything in between, we're grateful to be on this journey with you.

- The D&D Studio
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott


log in or register to remove this ad


Ok, I gotta admit, I skipped a bunch of pages in this thread, mostly because I had a pretty good idea of what people were going to be saying.

But WTF does the D&D Movie have to do with WotC shifting a policy after what, less than a week? How is WotC still the bad guy here? They announced they were going to do something. The fandom complained. WotC backtracks and gives fans what they want. All in about five days.

Wow, what a crappy company. How dare they!!! They are just the worst.

:erm:
 

Ok, I gotta admit, I skipped a bunch of pages in this thread, mostly because I had a pretty good idea of what people were going to be saying.

But WTF does the D&D Movie have to do with WotC shifting a policy after what, less than a week? How is WotC still the bad guy here? They announced they were going to do something. The fandom complained. WotC backtracks and gives fans what they want. All in about five days.

Wow, what a crappy company. How dare they!!! They are just the worst.

:erm:
I've been making this same argument for some time. Good luck.
 

You know what they say!

WoTC only opens their mouth to change feet.

Still, I will reiterate what I keep saying- there's nothing wrong with working to get them to change their position. But when they do the right thing, we should probably acknowledge that they are responsive. Sure, it would be better to not screw up to begin with.

However, looking around the landscape of companies today, I will take a bumbling company that screws up but at least listens to its consumers over all those companies that screw you up and keep on truckin'.

Any resemblance between that last sentence and David Zaslav is totally in your imagination.
The issue we run into, of course, is that forgiveness leans toward diminishing returns, and WotC allows as many of those bad things to stay in place as they can get away with. They have broadcast a desire to be bad, even if they have shown to be responsive when called out loudly enough.

They are not learning moral lessons so much as testing the defenses.
 

Yes a legal requirement that they disclose the information you are saying they should disclose. It's your choice to read it (and be informed about the subscription you are choosing) or to skip it and well... Or is the argument that WotC has a responsibility to force people to read the ToS? I'll ask again... what company does this?
I'm saying it feels unethical to let people believe that they own material they are renting. I do think DDB ought to be more pro-active about this, and so should other companies that rent electronic content in this way.
 


I'm saying it feels unethical to let people believe that they own material they are renting. I do think DDB ought to be more pro-active about this, and so should other companies that rent electronic content in this way.

No, I'm sorry but, IMO, this is the responsibility of being a consumer...they aren't forcing anyone to subscribe, it isn't any type of basic human need and they aren't letting people believe anything... people are making a choice to be uninformed if they do not read the ToS.
 



Remove ads

Remove ads

Top