D&D (2024) Wizards of the Coast Backtracks on D&D Beyond and 2014 Content

457249269_918504900314811_875922287646718169_n.jpg

Wizards of the Coast posted an overnight update stating that they are not going forward with previously released plans to require those wishing to use some 2014 content on D&D Beyond to use the Homebrew function to manually enter it. Instead, all the content including spells and magic items will be included. From the update:


Last week we released a Changelog detailing how players would experience the 2024 Core Rulebooks on D&D Beyond. We heard your feedback loud and clear and thank you for speaking up.

Our excitement around the 2024 Core Rulebooks led us to view these planned updates as welcome improvements and free upgrades to existing content. We misjudged the impact of this change, and we agree that you should be free to choose your own way to play. Taking your feedback to heart, here’s what we’re going to do:

Players who only have access to the 2014 Player’s Handbook will maintain their character options, spells, and magical items in their character sheets. Players with access to the 2024 and 2014 digital Player’s Handbooks can select from both sources when creating new characters. Players will not need to rely on Homebrew to use their 2014 player options, including spells and magic items, as recommended in previous changelogs.

Please Note:

Players will continue to have access to their free, shared, and purchased items on D&D Beyond, with the ability to use previously acquired player options when creating characters and using character sheets.

We are not changing players’ current character sheets, except for relabeling and renaming. Examples include Races to Species, Inspiration to Heroic Inspiration, and Cast Spell to Magic.

We’re dedicated to making D&D Beyond the ultimate digital toolset for Dungeons & Dragons, continuously enhancing the platform to ensure you can create, customize, and play your game just as you envision it. From your first one-shot to multi-year campaigns and everything in between, we're grateful to be on this journey with you.

- The D&D Studio
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott


log in or register to remove this ad

What? Was the OGL ever actually revoked? No. So please tell me what was proven?
It was proven that you could attempt and fail to revoke it? (I'm mostly kidding here, I'm not seriously answering the question).

I'm not sure that anyone truly thinks that they "own" anything on a digital subscription, regardless of whether they read the ToS or not. It won't stop them from complaining when/if they get "their" stuff taken away!
 

Really?? So was this phrasing also, IYO, stated as fact? If not what's the difference and if so...why didn't you call it out?
That phrase affects both sides of the discussion equally. Yours, IMO, does not.

Of course, the actual opinion you're expressing is perfectly fine.
 

It was only not revoked because they were pushed back on by the community. The realities of court costs are that it would not go any other way.

There are plenty of other examples in the news, but they are not D&D-related.

So nothing, absolutely nothing was actually proven by the example you gave. You're just speculating what would or could have happened.
 


It was proven that you could attempt and fail to revoke it? (I'm mostly kidding here, I'm not seriously answering the question).

I'm not sure that anyone truly thinks that they "own" anything on a digital subscription, regardless of whether they read the ToS or not. It won't stop them from complaining when/if they get "their" stuff taken away!
It is certainly presented as if you own the content, IMO.
 




Both sides downplay their mistakes and attempt to screw each other over.
Both sides make mountains out of molehills.... See I can do it too... still not seeing a difference, except you assumed I wasn't talking about WotC... it has nothing to do with having stated it as a fact or not.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top