D&D (2024) Wizards of the Coast Backtracks on D&D Beyond and 2014 Content

457249269_918504900314811_875922287646718169_n.jpg

Wizards of the Coast posted an overnight update stating that they are not going forward with previously released plans to require those wishing to use some 2014 content on D&D Beyond to use the Homebrew function to manually enter it. Instead, all the content including spells and magic items will be included. From the update:


Last week we released a Changelog detailing how players would experience the 2024 Core Rulebooks on D&D Beyond. We heard your feedback loud and clear and thank you for speaking up.

Our excitement around the 2024 Core Rulebooks led us to view these planned updates as welcome improvements and free upgrades to existing content. We misjudged the impact of this change, and we agree that you should be free to choose your own way to play. Taking your feedback to heart, here’s what we’re going to do:

Players who only have access to the 2014 Player’s Handbook will maintain their character options, spells, and magical items in their character sheets. Players with access to the 2024 and 2014 digital Player’s Handbooks can select from both sources when creating new characters. Players will not need to rely on Homebrew to use their 2014 player options, including spells and magic items, as recommended in previous changelogs.

Please Note:

Players will continue to have access to their free, shared, and purchased items on D&D Beyond, with the ability to use previously acquired player options when creating characters and using character sheets.

We are not changing players’ current character sheets, except for relabeling and renaming. Examples include Races to Species, Inspiration to Heroic Inspiration, and Cast Spell to Magic.

We’re dedicated to making D&D Beyond the ultimate digital toolset for Dungeons & Dragons, continuously enhancing the platform to ensure you can create, customize, and play your game just as you envision it. From your first one-shot to multi-year campaigns and everything in between, we're grateful to be on this journey with you.

- The D&D Studio
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott


log in or register to remove this ad

For now. Money and power are forever sought. It's just not a profitable fight at the moment.
It would never be a profitable fight. That's what they revealed. I suppose that it's possible that they didn't actually learn that lesson (though they'd have to be in willful denial to have missed it).

They never backed down on their belief that they could do it. They backed down on actually doing it.
How do you know what they believe? Because someone on the apology tour tried spinning it as "both sides winning"? It's very possible that they meant "those of us inside WotC that thought it was a foolish thing to do, also won".

Even if whoever was dumb enough to order it (probably Cocks) thinks that they could still do it later, it doesn't matter - THEY ARE WRONG. They can burn the house down instead.
 



This is going to tank my reaction to post ratio. xD

This is a really deep topic and needs context. And I am not commenting on the merits because thats not a debate I want. Just asking a question.

The real question here is; do people have a right to the labor that is used to clean the water? Or do they only have a right to the water that they have to clean themselves?

Those are very different statements. A right to labor has implications.
Off-topic, but Nestle is well known for negotiating water rights with local municipalities that are absurdly BAD DEALS for the local community. They literally steal water from locals who need it, so they can bottle it for a profit. Nestle is classic "evil corporation".
 

It would never be a profitable fight. That's what they revealed. I suppose that it's possible that they didn't actually learn that lesson (though they'd have to be in willful denial to have missed it).


How do you know what they believe? Because someone on the apology tour tried spinning it as "both sides winning"? It's very possible that they meant "those of us inside WotC that thought it was a foolish thing to do, also won".

Even if whoever was dumb enough to order it (probably Cocks) thinks that they could still do it later, it doesn't matter - THEY ARE WRONG. They can burn the house down instead.
If you're right, why did many publishers, including Paizo, decide to re-work their entire system to remove any connection to the OGL? Surely they wouldn't bother if WotC admitted they had no ability to revoke it, right?
 




If you're right, why did many publishers, including Paizo, decide to re-work their entire system to remove any connection to the OGL? Surely they wouldn't bother if WotC admitted they had no ability to revoke it, right?

You could argue optics here.

I think the reason this argument works, is that legally creative commons removes most, if not all, incentive for WotC to do it in regards to SRD 5.1. It would essentially be terrible press just to force other publishers to do paper work.
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top