D&D (2024) Wizards of the Coast Backtracks on D&D Beyond and 2014 Content

457249269_918504900314811_875922287646718169_n.jpg

Wizards of the Coast posted an overnight update stating that they are not going forward with previously released plans to require those wishing to use some 2014 content on D&D Beyond to use the Homebrew function to manually enter it. Instead, all the content including spells and magic items will be included. From the update:


Last week we released a Changelog detailing how players would experience the 2024 Core Rulebooks on D&D Beyond. We heard your feedback loud and clear and thank you for speaking up.

Our excitement around the 2024 Core Rulebooks led us to view these planned updates as welcome improvements and free upgrades to existing content. We misjudged the impact of this change, and we agree that you should be free to choose your own way to play. Taking your feedback to heart, here’s what we’re going to do:

Players who only have access to the 2014 Player’s Handbook will maintain their character options, spells, and magical items in their character sheets. Players with access to the 2024 and 2014 digital Player’s Handbooks can select from both sources when creating new characters. Players will not need to rely on Homebrew to use their 2014 player options, including spells and magic items, as recommended in previous changelogs.

Please Note:

Players will continue to have access to their free, shared, and purchased items on D&D Beyond, with the ability to use previously acquired player options when creating characters and using character sheets.

We are not changing players’ current character sheets, except for relabeling and renaming. Examples include Races to Species, Inspiration to Heroic Inspiration, and Cast Spell to Magic.

We’re dedicated to making D&D Beyond the ultimate digital toolset for Dungeons & Dragons, continuously enhancing the platform to ensure you can create, customize, and play your game just as you envision it. From your first one-shot to multi-year campaigns and everything in between, we're grateful to be on this journey with you.

- The D&D Studio
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Darryl Mott

Darryl Mott

Mate, speaking as a person who makes websites from tune to time... DDNB is just trash because they don't care.

The proof? They have a megathread asking about bugs/improvements/etc.

They have feats that are broken. I have remade these feats using the homebrew tool. I have fixed the feats, and provided them the link to my fixed version of the feat that does what their feat should do - eg, claims it gives you stats and a spell but only gives you the stat, not the spell, etc, etc, etc...

They will still not fix the feat, even with the solution handed to them where they can just copy what I did, where the work of figuring out "how" is already done for them.

And that's with me only having access to the homebrew feature, not even having access to their full creation portal because I don't have any special access.

They really give zero shits, and then they wonder why almost no one who isn't a DM isn't paying - why would we pay for such naughty word?
Which feats?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Are you dealing them directly then and not via Diamond, the previous champion of trying to slay the industry?
IMO Diamond gets an undeserved bad rap. I don't like Geppi (the owner) at all, but he often let small stores (mine's small, but I never had trouble paying my bills) slide on payments for much longer than he reasonably needed to, and really helped to get people started.

Diamond also never tried to get a "monopoly" - that was Marvel's fault for starting a Distribution War that put all of Diamond's competitors under, before Marvel killed its own distributor and went to Diamond as well.

Diamond's main crime, IMO, was making it hard for truly small publishers to have any chance at all, with high placement costs, but I doubt that they're any better now, with Diamond cut down to size. It's not like the new Distributors are any better than Diamond was - Penguin, for example, is absolutely terrible at all aspects of the comic biz.

But this is probably too much of a digression, not that I suppose there are ENlaws against digression.

Edit to answer your actual question, No, I don't deal with them directly.
 






Sorry, this is untrue. Your words were "obsolete edition rules". Perhaps you didn't intend to write about editions, but I can only respond to the words you actually wrote.
That will teach me not to post after two glasses of malbec.
3ed to 3.5 was not the same edition, so I'm not sure what the point is.
It was as close to 2024 as we have been. Small changes to classes and a few updated rule systems.
No 'beef' - it's not personal. Just correcting incorrect information being given out. They nuked the GleeMax forums. They took away my 4e subscription regardless if I wanted to pay for it. Wizards of the Coast has been very tough on previous editions, and since they claim this is the same edition they don't suddenly get a pass.
It sounds like a massive beef. So I would think you’d be glad that for the first time they have kept stuff.
 

It was as close to 2024 as we have been. Small changes to classes and a few updated rule systems.
2e core is honestly pretty damn similar to 1e core as well, same goes for all the different versions of basic. Most edition changes in D&D have been relatively minor and mostly backwards compatible if you wanted to make the effort (I was using a mix of Basic, 1e, and 2e rules at one point as a kid, 3e, 4e and 5e have been more the exception than the rule over the whole 50 years of D&D.
 

2e core is honestly pretty damn similar to 1e core as well, same goes for all the different versions of basic. Most edition changes in D&D have been relatively minor and mostly backwards compatible if you wanted to make the effort (I was using a mix of Basic, 1e, and 2e rules at one point as a kid, 3e, 4e and 5e have been more the exception than the rule over the whole 50 years of D&D.
So "only" three fifths of the rules changes were big?

(I'm mostly teasing you - there's been more like seventeen rules changes, and you're right - three of them were full overhauls and the rest were a variety of relatively smaller revisions).
 

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top