Evil Genius Games Attempts To Remove Bad Press [Update--And Then Adds Legal Threats!]

Screenshot 2025-01-23 at 12.14.39 AM.png


Evil Genius Games, publisher of the Everyday Heroes tabletop roleplaying game, and subject of two articles in 2024 here on EN World, is attempting to remove references to documented history which delves into the company's actions by citing court documents and interviews with former employees.

[Update--EGG has recruited a lawyer who has sent us a cease-and-desist letter; scroll down to the end of the article for the update]

In early 2024 several employees of Evil Genius Game resigned, citing ethical concerns with the company's activities. I investigated the allegations, obtained court documents and internal correspondence, and interviewed a number of ex-employees, as well as CEO Dave Scott himself, culminating in a lengthy article which provided a deep dive into the issue. That article was followed by another in June 2024 covering EGG's participation in a pitch competition at an event at Consensus 2024, a convention in Texas run by Coindesk, and its description of the Web3 technologies it proposed using.


Reddit user calculusbear posted a link in 2024 to my article about EGG's business practices. On January 14th of this year (2025), EGG's CEO Dave Scott messaged calculusbear asking them to take down the link claiming that it (the Reddit link, not the article or, indeed, EGG's own actions) was "destroying my company". Calculusbear has, to date, not taken down that link.

Last year, I had shared an Enworld article regarding the activities of Evil Genius Games, makers of Everyday Heroes in this sub.

A week ago, I received a message on reddit from their CEO, Dave Scott, asking me to remove the post. He claimed it was hurting his company. This is quite the interesting situation I find myself in; a reddit post causing harm to a company. But it's not like there has been any clarifying news since.

Either way, I would ask Mr Scott to share the discussion he wishes to have first, before asking me to remove the post.

This isn't the first time that EGG has attempted to quell criticism. In 2024 the CEO threatened ex-employees with legal action should they speak openly about their experiences--at the time I was shown letters to multiple staff from EGG's legal representatives threatening action in response to their post-resignation statements; and when I spoke to them while researching my article last year, they all expressed concerns about retribution.

In the interests of balance, I'll note that Scott claims in his message that my article (which backs up every statement with court documents, internal company documents, email transcripts, and interview statements) "sighted many inaccurate facts" [sic].

Hi Calculus Bear. My name is Dave Scott and I am the CEO of Evil Genius Games. About a year ago there was a post that highlighted an article by ENWorld that predicted the fall of my company. The article is one sided. It sighted many inaccurate facts that really hurt me personally and my company. Since then, the thread has been archived, but for some reason it still shows up on the front page of Google Search. A year later, this article is destroying my company. Is there any chance you would consider removing the archived thread? I'm happy to have a deeper discussion about what is going on with the thread and my company. Thank you.

Whether the Reddit link is 'destroying the company' is hard to say. Just three months ago, in November 2024, the venture capital firm Alumni Ventures, part of a syndicate which includes Blockchain Founders Fund and Hustle Fund, amongst others, talked about their proud investment in EGG. EGG's most recent crowdfunder, The Armory, raised $47.5K (their original Everyday Heroes Kickstarter raised nearly $400K, while the followup Legendary Bundle raised $115K).

This week EGG launched its digital platform, 'Sidekick'. The advertising for the platform contains no references to technologies such as NFTs and blockchains, for which the company has previously been criticised. It's not clear whether EGG has reversed its position on the ethics of Web3 tech or whether it's still planning on using it.

The original article had largely fallen off the radar, but has seen increased traffic recently due to the company's attempts to hide it (an effect known popularly as the Streisand Effect).

Screenshot-20250121-102249 (1).png



Update (Jan 23, 2025) -- "Legal Cease and Desist Letter To Remove the Defamatory Content under Defamation Law"

Evil Genius Games' CEO Dave Scott is making legal threats against journalists and news outlets which covered the original story.

EN World received an email from a gmail account named 'Legal Law' purporting to be a lawyer. The email is titled "Legal Cease and Desist Letter To Remove the Defamatory Content under Defamation Law", and was the first and only contact I'd had with or from EGG since the original article in early 2024.*

Dear Legal Team,

I hope this letter finds you well. I am writing to formally request the immediate removal of a defamatory post that has been published on your website. The defamatory post in question was posted on your website without knowing the truth. The post contains false and damaging statements that have caused significant harm to the reputation and well-being of the company.

As you may be aware, defamation refers to the act of making false statements about an individual or entity that harm their reputation. It is my duty to inform you that the defamatory post on your website violates defamation laws and poses legal ramifications for all parties involved. The false information contained within the post has caused substantial harm to company's professional and personal character.

We kindly request that you remove the defamatory post immediately to prevent further dissemination of false information and to avoid potential legal consequences. Failure to comply with this request will leave us with no option but to pursue legal action against your website and the user responsible for the defamatory post.

Here is the link in question;

[Link to original article about Evil Genius Games]

In accordance with the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) and the Communications Decency Act (CDA), has a legal obligation to promptly remove defamatory content upon receipt of a valid takedown notice. We trust that, as a responsible platform, will take immediate action to remove the defamatory post and prevent further harm to company's reputation.

We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and request confirmation of the removal of the defamatory post within reasonable time frame from the receipt of this letter. Should you have any questions or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me directly.

Thank you for your cooperation. We hope to resolve this matter amicably and without resorting to legal measures.

Yours sincerely,

Tauqeer Ahmed

With a quick Google search, it became quickly apparent that this exact letter (word for word) has been posted numerous times on the internet (such as here, here, here, and here--this last one by Irfan Karim, DMCA AGENT), and is extremely unspecific--it doesn't say who his client is, what law firm he works for, comes from a gmail account, refers to IP-related legislation in the context of an alleged libel accusation, and contains no indication that the author is familiar with the subject in question. As such we weren't convinced that it was genuine and felt it prudent to contact Dave Scott to confirm whether Tauqeer Ahmed did, in fact, represent Evil Genius Games. Scott replied in the affirmative.



*For transparency, I'll note that after I posted this article Scott then posted on my personal Facebook page (which I removed) and emailed me again; but since a legal threat has been issued I felt it inappropriate that we interact further and passed the threatening letter to our legal advisers. Additionally, as EN World's terms and conditions make clear, once a legal threat has been issued EGG is no longer entitled to post on EN World.

Legal Threats
If you make a legal threat (including accusations using legal terminology like "slander" or "libel", or a threat of legal action) against the site, or against a staff member, we will treat it respectfully and seriously. To this end:
  • You may no longer use or post on the site.
  • We will no longer respond to direct messages from you; we refer you to our mailing address, and your correspondence will be passed to our legal counsel.
  • We refer you to our mailing address which is provided on our contact page on enworld.org for the convenience of your legal counsel.



Update (Jan 24, 2025) -- Not Being Sued After All
I woke up this morning to see Dave Scott had sent me a note indicating that he does not intend to sue EN World. I haven't replied, as my policy is not to engage with people who have threatened me with legal action, but I figure folks would want to know. Hopefully that puts an end to the matter, but who knows?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

The pattern of "if the alleged victim didn't do what I think is the right process, it didn't happen" is common... and often very wrong.

If you're referring to my post, that's not what I said. He may well have been harassed. What I said was that the proper way to deal with that is not to sue Morrus, but to contact the authorities (I do know why some people don't contact the authorities; that still doesn't make suing Morrus the proper solution to his problems).
 

log in or register to remove this ad



The absence of a police report is less of a gotcha than one might think. In many jurisdictions, the police have no interest in such things. Many won’t even take a report. Of those who will, many will take literally no action whatsoever, as long as the attackers aren’t fitting into any of the kinds of villain groups the police want to do something else. One reason a lot of targeted people don’t go the police is that they know someone else in the same jurisdiction who tried it and got no help, and possibly even harassed by the authorities.
I mean, I agree with you, definitely. But considering it was an AMA, he could have said "I tried to file a police report but they weren't interested."
 


It will be interesting to see if the Rascal piece is an article or just a self-posted PR statement. Fingers crossed.
This* Rascal? Lin Codega's Rascal? Whatever it will be I doubt it will be some fluff piece.

*(Couldn't figure out why the link wouldn't stick... the URL has the NSFW word in it. It's about gaming communities kicking out Nazis and specifically banning Twitter/X discussion/links from their discussion sites)
Even if/when the authorities do nothing, you will often want to contact them anyway to get it on the record.
The thing, for some people*, especially those from already marginalized communities, the authorities "doing nothing" is not the worst case scenario. It is, in fact, far from it.

*(This isn't even always about race or gender... one of the least safe things to be around a cop in the US is someone with mental illness)
 

Read the updates. Glad that it's not an issue, and that Morrus (correctly) referred it to his legal team.

There are multiple reasons why this appears to be a cut-and-paste job, and that no remotely competent (or even incompetent) attorney would send something like this. But if you have attorneys, it's always best to send this type of thing to them ... just in case.

Anyway, for my edification and amusement, reasons why this looks SO FAKE-

1. The "attorney" doesn't identify who he is, his physical address, or his firm.
2. No identification of who the client is.
3. It was sent to "Legal Team?" Um ... if you are sending to a person (an unrepresented person or a company) you address it to them, and state at the beginning that if they are represented, to immediately provide it to counsel.
4. No law? "Defamation law" isn't a thing. This would be libel, and an attorney would probably provide at least a little more information ... just to show off and/or intimidate, if nothing else.
5. "The defamatory post in question was posted on your website without knowing the truth." Not the standard, and you wouldn't go in like that. You would identify specific comments as false and DEMAND they be removed. It's called a DEMAND letter (or cease and desist, depending) for a reason.
6. "Failure to comply with this request will leave us with no option but to pursue legal action against your website and the user responsible for the defamatory post." No. You don't sue a website, you sue a legal entity. You'd name the responsible legal entity.
7. On the CDA and DMCA- the CDA protects on-line places that publish defamation under US law (and that is US law) which means that under the CDA, Enworld isn't responsible for the content created by the idiot users like me. And the DMCA isn't used for taking down defamatory comment.* It's notable that he is quoting the US laws, as different areas can be more protective (EU, right to be forgotten, etc.). As a general rule, the only sure-fire way to get defamatory content removed is to get a court order- you have to first get a court to say it is defamation, and then get it removed.
8. "We appreciate your prompt attention to this matter and request confirmation of the removal of the defamatory post within reasonable time frame from the receipt of this letter." Nope. Reasonable timeframe? No attorney would do that- there is always some sort of deadline, because ... c'mon, reasonable?

Anyway, I hate that this sort of stuff is so common today. Getting real letters like this is bad enough; we shouldn't have to do with the fake ones as well.
 




Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top