Agreed, there are 3 components to his claim and I dispute the other two. Wealth increases with Age, ok sure I'll bet that's true. Dollars spent increases with Wealth, debatable. Prospensity to prefer older DnD editions increases with Age, I disagree without evidence
Valid. And mostly had a similar experience in and through all editions.The thing is, there's only so much you can actually spend on WotC products. It's a few books a year, even if you buy all of them. So I'm not sure that much of the higher disposable income of us old-timers is going to make its way to WotC/Hasbro.
I'm going to Gen Con this year. I've got tickets to see the Critical Role show there. I'll likely be backing another Dwarven Forge kickstarter, not to mention the next Dungeons and Lasers one. And I just backed another C'Mon games KS. So I am definitely spending money I didn't have when I was a youth, but little of it is going to WotC. What is going to them is $7/month for DDB and maybe $100 for mostly digital books (well, more last year because I had to have the anniversary OD&D book). I don't think I'm actually giving more to WotC, relative to inflation, than I gave annually to TSR when I was 15 (buying the physical books/modules plus Dragon magazine every month). Probably less!
Edit: writing that made me realize that Hasbro is not wrong to note that D&D is poorly monetized. I'm not saying that's good or bad, but for such a well-recognized brand, there's not a ton to spend your money on, at least when it comes to the people who own the actual brand.
I want to know if I'm forever a master since I started with 1e, or if I get to join the ranks of the grandmasters once I hit 61.Well, as a Grandmaster Grognard (as per your list), not sure I think I matter to WotC as a customer anymore, but I sure wish I did!
So you think!The massive error here is assuming people of the same generation share the same opinions and tastes.
They don't matter because they are not a unified group.
Better Grandmaster Grognard than Grandmaster Pee.Do I have permission as you hath decreed to title myself Grandmaster Grognard?
If I've had three of those, does that just make me confused?Certainly, sir. And of course (as I tired to make clear), the categorizations are just a bit of fun and rather silly.
I mean, I think Luke Gygax is chronologically Master level, but gets honorary Grandmastery. I suppose anyone who was playing D&D before the AD&D books game out probably gets membership.
But more seriously, I think there is a generational difference between those who were cognizant while early D&D was developing and those, like myself, who caught the wave of the early 80s boom when there was already an established tradition of D&D.
Or to put it another way, if you had this you're definitely a Grandmaster:
View attachment 397360
If you had this, you're on the cusp but probably still a Grandmaster:
View attachment 397361
If this is Tomb of Horrors to you, then you're a Master:
View attachment 397363
If it is this, then you're an Expert:
View attachment 397365
If it is this, you're an Apprentice or Novice:
View attachment 397366
As do some others, but the rest of us grognards don't have to let you guys control the term.Repeated: I use grognared only in the most derisive way imaginable, I have not an iota of respect when I use the term