What are you reading in 2025?

I just finished reading a beat up first printing of Poul Anderson's 1961 novel Three Hearts and Three Lions.

I purchased this several years ago, as part of an effort to read more of D&D's famous Appendix N. What ended up happening is that I instead started reading more nonfiction about D&D in particular, and gaming in general, which somehow morphed into reading a more diverse array of nonfiction. It was only because I wanted a palate-cleanser that I picked this up and finally read it through.

Needless to say, my palate has indeed been cleansed. I strongly suspected I would like this, based on what I knew about it beforehand, and I'm pleased to say that my expectations were not only met but exceeded. This novel is a genuine classic, and even apart from its influence on D&D, it's a story which anyone with an appreciation for fantasy should take the time to read.

I've read stories whose prose has been uninspiring and workmanlike, and I've read those that have been grandiloquent and excessively florid; achieving a balance between those two is something that a lot of authors seem to have trouble with, and many seem to accomplish that only by developing a style that's unpretentious to the point of being easy but plain. Anderson, however, dodges all of those faults with ease, his writing being erudite while still being snappy to the point of deftness, making the novel engaging in the truest sense of the word.

In terms of the plot, the story is no less self-aware. While I suspect that everyone knows the basic premise of the tale, whereby Holger Carlsen (a Danish fellow who'd been educated in America before returning home to help with the resistance effort during World War II) is fighting Nazis, only to be injured in the battle and lose consciousness, awakening to find himself in another world. But the big twist...

...which is that this other world is in fact Holger's world of origin...

...is in fact not only lampshaded early on, but directly confronted by the protagonist, who makes note of the various clues as they pile up and point toward the inevitable conclusion. This contrasts very well with Holger's continued use of scientific reasoning (due to his education and background) to confront several of the problems he faces (which lets him overcome them, rather than turning him into a Dana Scully-style serial disbeliever).

If I had any complaints about the book, it would be how the ending left me wanting more, since other than a short epilogue, the story comes to a rather abrupt ending once the climax is achieved, leaving me hungry for a greater resolution than it offered. Unfortunately, that's not to be, since the Wikipedia article for the book indicates that while Anderson made a few vague references to future events in a few of his later writings, there was no sequel or subsequent denouement (though there was apparently a short story to that effect written in tribute after Anderson's death, but the summary for it on that Wikipedia page struck me as somewhat unsatisfying).

That said, my takeaway from this is that I need to read more Anderson, stat. I've always preferred fantasy to science fiction, but while Anderson seems to have more of the latter than the former, I suspect I'd like almost anything written by him, at least if this book was indicative of his standard fare. I think I'll try and get ahold of a copy of Operation Chaos next.
 
Last edited:

log in or register to remove this ad

I just finished reading a beat up first printing of Poul Anderson's 1961 novel Three Hearts and Three Lions.

I purchased this several years ago, as part of an effort to read more of D&D's famous Appendix N. What ended up happening is that I instead started reading more nonfiction about D&D in particular, and gaming in general, which somehow morphed into reading a more diverse array of nonfiction. It was only because I wanted a palate-cleanser that I picked this up and finally read it through.

Needless to say, my palate has indeed been cleansed. I strongly suspected I would like this, based on what I knew about it beforehand, and I'm pleased to say that my expectations were not only met but exceeded. This novel is a genuine classic, and even apart from its influence on D&D, it's a story which anyone with an appreciation for fantasy should take the time to read.

I've read stories whose prose has been uninspiring and workmanlike, and I've read those that have been grandiloquent and excessively florid; achieving a balance between those two is something that a lot of authors seem to have trouble with, and many seem to accomplish that only by developing a style that's unpretentious to the point of being easy but plain. Anderson, however, dodges all of those faults with ease, his writing being erudite while still being snappy to the point of deftness, making the novel engaging in the truest sense of the word.

In terms of the plot, the story is no less self-aware. While I suspect that everyone knows the basic premise of the tale, whereby Holger Carlsen (a Danish fellow who'd been educated in America before returning home to help fight with the resistance effort during World War II) is fighting Nazis, only to be injured in the battle and lose consciousness, awakening to find himself in another world. But the big twist...

...which is that this other world is in fact Holger's world of origin...

...is in fact not only lampshaded early on, but directly confronted by the protagonist, who makes note of the various clues as they pile up and point toward the inevitable conclusion. This contrasts very well with Holger's continued use of scientific reasoning (due to his education and background) to confront several of the problems he faces (which lets him overcome them, rather than turning him into a Dana Scully-style serial disbeliever).

If I had any complaints about the book, it would be how the ending left me wanting more, since other than a short epilogue, the story comes to a rather abrupt ending once the climax is achieved, leaving me hungry for a greater resolution than it offered. Unfortunately, that's not to be, since the Wikipedia article for the book indicates that Anderson made a few vague references to subsequent events in his writings, there was no sequel or subsequent denouement (though there was apparently a short story to that effect written in tribute after Anderson's death, but the summary for it on that Wikipedia page struck me as somewhat unsatisfying).

That said, my takeaway from this is that I need to read more Anderson, stat. I've always preferred fantasy to science fiction, but while Anderson seems to have more of the latter than the former, I suspect I'd like almost anything written by him, at least if this book was indicative of his standard fare. I think I'll try and get ahold of a copy of Operation Chaos next.

This was a good one, and genuinely helpful to understanding D&D
 

I'm going to talk to my GF about teaching, since until recently she was an 8th-grade English teacher - presumably one of the primary drivers behind the push to turn boys away from reading and intellectual pursuits.
So, I asked my gf about this. She quit teaching in February 2020 because the students and parents in her new school were absolutely awful, and the administration had no support. Before that, she taught English for about 20 years at the 8th-grade level. So she's not totally current, but not a lot changes that quickly, particularly these days.

She says they've done tons of actual scientific research, and the answer is...unclear. Lots of factors. Everyone knows about it; everyone has a theory; no one has a solution. Part of the solution IS offering boys in particular books about boys, because (scientific, controlled) research show that while women buy the majority of books with female protagonists, they also buy the majority of books with male protagonists. Men overwhelmingly won't buy books with female protagonists. So for example, men might buy 40% of the books with male protagonists, and 10% of the books with female protagonists.

It wasn't a very long convo, so that's it for now.
 


I just finished reading a beat up first printing of Poul Anderson's 1961 novel Three Hearts and Three Lions.
...
That said, my takeaway from this is that I need to read more Anderson, stat. I've always preferred fantasy to science fiction, but while Anderson seems to have more of the latter than the former, I suspect I'd like almost anything written by him, at least if this book was indicative of his standard fare. I think I'll try and get ahold of a copy of Operation Chaos next.
I'd strongly recommend The Broken Sword. I prefer it to Three Hearts and Three Lions, and I suspect in many ways it had an equal or stronger influence on D&D (...gnomes...).
 

So, I asked my gf about this. She quit teaching in February 2020 because the students and parents in her new school were absolutely awful, and the administration had no support. Before that, she taught English for about 20 years at the 8th-grade level. So she's not totally current, but not a lot changes that quickly, particularly these days.

She says they've done tons of actual scientific research, and the answer is...unclear. Lots of factors. Everyone knows about it; everyone has a theory; no one has a solution. Part of the solution IS offering boys in particular books about boys, because (scientific, controlled) research show that while women buy the majority of books with female protagonists, they also buy the majority of books with male protagonists. Men overwhelmingly won't buy books with female protagonists. So for example, men might buy 40% of the books with male protagonists, and 10% of the books with female protagonists.

It wasn't a very long convo, so that's it for now.
Sure we do. The problem starts long before the children start school, with the stories they are told and the toys they are given before they can talk. This creates a feedback type effect where as they develop the child seeks out more of the same.

Oh, and between us, my partner and I have around 70 years of teaching experience.
 

Poul Anderson was such a good writer. There’s a direct line between my reading him and majoring in history. From “Ivory, and Apes, and Peacocks”, one of the Time Patrol stories:

With a burgeoning population and a bustling commerce thus crowded together, houses climbed upward, story upon story until they loomed over the guardian walls like small skyscrapers. They seemed to be less often of brick than of stone and cedarwood. Where earth and plaster had been used, frescos or inlaid shells ornamented them. On the eastward side, Everard glimpsed a huge and noble structure which the king had had built not for himself but for civic uses.

Mago’s ship was bound for the outer or southern port, the Egyptian Harbor as he called it. Its piers bustled, men loading, unloading, fetching, bearing off, repairing, outfitting, dickering, arguing, chaffering, a tumble and chaos that somehow got its jobs done. Dock wallopers, donkey drivers, and other laborers, like the seamen on this cargo-cluttered deck, wore merely loincloths, or kaftans faded and patched. But plenty of brighter garments were in sight, some flaunting the costly colors that were produced here. Occasional women passed among the men, and Everard’s preliminary education told him that they weren’t all hookers. Sound rolled out to meet him, talk, laughter, shouts, braying, neighing, footfalls, hoofbeats, hammerbeats, groan of wheels and cranes, twanging music. The vitality was well-nigh overwhelming.

Not that this was any prettified scene in an Arabian Nights movie. Already he made out beggars crippled, blind, starving; he saw a lash touch up a slave who toiled too slowly; beasts of burden fared worse. The smells of the ancient East roiled forth, smoke, dung, offal, sweat, as well as tar, spices, and savory roastings. Added to them was a stench of dyeworks and murex-shell middens on the mainland; but sailing along the coast and camping ashore every night, he had gotten used to that by now.

He didn’t take the drawbacks to heart. His farings through history had cured him of fastidiousness and case-hardened him to the cruelties of man and nature—somewhat. For their era, these Canaanites were an enlightened and happy people. In fact, they were more so than most of humanity almost everywhere and every when.

His task was to keep them that way.
 

They can turn assignments in late for full credit and there is no push for excellence.
I can't speak to the rest of your experience - I teach at an IB World school and there is no problem with rigour. However, not taking marks off for disciplinary reasons is good pedagogy. Work should be assessed based upon the preset criteria for the task. Failing to hand in work or handing it in late is a disciplinary matter and should be corrected through disciplinary actions, not lazily taking marks off assignments.

If the skill is so important that it needs to be assessed, it needs to be assessed. At our school, students don't get a 0 on the assignment, they get an "Incomplete" for the course until the work is properly completed and assessed. That's only negotiable in extreme circumstances (e.g. a serious, ongoing medical situation).
 

I can't speak to the rest of your experience - I teach at an IB World school and there is no problem with rigour. However, not taking marks off for disciplinary reasons is good pedagogy. Work should be assessed based upon the preset criteria for the task. Failing to hand in work or handing it in late is a disciplinary matter and should be corrected through disciplinary actions, not lazily taking marks off assignments.

If the skill is so important that it needs to be assessed, it needs to be assessed. At our school, students don't get a 0 on the assignment, they get an "Incomplete" for the course until the work is properly completed and assessed. That's only negotiable in extreme circumstances (e.g. a serious, ongoing medical situation).

I'm a big fan of setting up primary/secondary school for kids to learn and not just grade/bean count them into submission (Our local district sets the minimum percent a student can earn at the end of each quarter as a 50% so that the grades essentially work like GPA for the course over the span of a year, so 3C+ and F = C- not F, and a student who bombs a quarter doesn't have all their motivation to even try taken away. It's amazing how knee-jerk people can be against that based on whether you start explaining it analogous to GPA vs. how they were graded back in the day). But I'm also leery of piling things up on discipline (I'm assuming your district does it better than many and the repeat penalties don't quickly accrue to disciplinary levels that keep them out of the classroom).

In any case, I hope the ones going on to college/uni figure out turning things in on time before they get there. I'm guessing at most of those they will run into profs who hand out zeros for missing work like candy at halloween ... and in a lot of states now those grades will turn off the scholarships the states give (instead of just funding the schools and keeping tuition low).
 
Last edited:

The Rex Stout biography works better in small batches, so still going through it.

Reread Josephine Tey's "The Franchise Affair". I think It is truly outstanding (especially in terms of the quality of writing and the insights the various characters have).

Started "An Expert in Murder" by Nicola Upson which uses a version of Tey as the main character. (Which is interesting in that Tey itself was a pseudonym). Very enjoyable a few chapters in..
 

Remove ads

Top