WotC Would you buy WotC products produced or enhanced with AI?

Would you buy a WotC products with content made by AI?

  • Yes

    Votes: 45 13.8%
  • Yes, but only using ethically gathered data (like their own archives of art and writing)

    Votes: 12 3.7%
  • Yes, but only with AI generated art

    Votes: 1 0.3%
  • Yes, but only with AI generated writing

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Yes, but only if- (please share your personal clause)

    Votes: 14 4.3%
  • Yes, but only if it were significantly cheaper

    Votes: 6 1.8%
  • No, never

    Votes: 150 46.2%
  • Probably not

    Votes: 54 16.6%
  • I do not buy WotC products regardless

    Votes: 43 13.2%

Status
Not open for further replies.
So let's say I cared enough, and I certainly don't, to ask for the 2nd sentence. Then the 3rd. On and on.

Do you think I couldn't rebuild the story, verbatim?
That's right.
It converts the training data into model data. It's essentially using spatial relationships and indirect references to store data instead of raw text, but the information is still there even if it's extremely difficult to untangle it precisely. Whether or not the alteration is sufficient for legal purposes, it's still storing the information.
I don't think we are going to make further progress here. Suffice to say I don't think your description is accurate.
 

log in or register to remove this ad



That's right.

I guess we will never know.

AndYet.JPG
 


It converts the training data into model data. It's essentially using spatial relationships and indirect references to store data instead of raw text, but the information is still there even if it's extremely difficult to untangle it precisely. Whether or not the alteration is sufficient for legal purposes, it's still storing the information.

If it's still there but extremely difficult to untangle and most probably incomplete given the loss of information, would you really judge a tool on what it can do under an extremely difficult scenario to implement? I can probably do all sort of illegal actions with a spoon, if I try enough, yet spoons are OK where I live, because their normal use case makes them sufficently useful to keep allowed, despite the inherent risk of having everyone able to misuse a spoon. One might have the opinion that the benefits of the tool don't outweigh the cost, or the other way round, but I don't feel that banning a tool unless it can't have a harmful usecase is generally a good idea. We'd be using very few tools.
 
Last edited:





Status
Not open for further replies.
Remove ads

Top