Worlds of Design: From Zero to Hero

What makes a hero a hero?
super-6698001_1280.jpg

Picture courtesy of Pixabay.

“This is why the new novels die so quickly, and why the old fairy tales endure forever. The old fairy tale makes the hero a normal human boy; it is his adventures that are startling; they startle him because he is normal. But in the modern psychological novel the hero is abnormal.” G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936)

The debate over the fundamental nature of the hero has endured for centuries. As noted by author G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936), the appeal of the old fairy tale lies in making heroes start out as someone just like us. Conversely, Chesterton observed that the modern psychological novel often makes the hero abnormal. This distinction raises a perennial question for tabletop role-playing games: Are our heroes normal people or comic-book style superheroes?

This discussion continues a long-running inquiry into heroic identity, which we explored previously in discussions about whether heroes are born or made and how our perceptions of heroics have evolved from a black and white morality to shades of grey. Today, the focus is firmly on the question of normalcy.

What's Normal, Anyway?​

To clarify the terms, we can define normal as "conforming to a typical or expected standard, being usual, ordinary, or average, and free from defect or irregularity." Abnormal, by contrast, simply means "deviating from what is normal or usual," without necessarily carrying a pejorative meaning. Even within the definition of "normal," there is a wide range; for instance, a person who is two meters tall is still within the realm of normal, though certainly an outlier.

Fantasy and Mundane Archetypes​

Chesterton’s ideal of the "normal boy" is closely echoed by characters like Bilbo, Frodo, and Sam in The Hobbit and The Lord of the Rings. This is unsurprising, given that J.R.R. Tolkien was steeped in fairy tales and only a generation younger than Chesterton. It has been suggested that the hobbits, as a whole, represent normal people thrust into extraordinary circumstances.

Contrast this with Aragorn, who is born with a heroic destiny already assigned to him. Even so, he must apply bravery and dedication to achieve it, much like a gifted young athlete who must strive to become a star. Athletes themselves offer an interesting parallel to heroes, existing on both sides of the normal/abnormal spectrum. Players like Brooks Robinson became great through sheer hard work, while others start with exceptional gifts. Even an outlier like Mugsy Bogues, a 5'3" NBA player in a sport dominated by larger athletes, can be seen as representing the normal among the abnormal.

From Normal Start to Abnormal Finish​

How players and Game Masters approach character generation often dictates where a hero begins on this spectrum. Some GMs prefer to create "normal" characters by using dice-rolling methods like 3d6, forcing players to take abilities in the order rolled. Other GMs create "abnormal" characters right away by allowing players to generate far-above-average statistics or backgrounds. Even point-buy systems, like the one used in Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition, might force characters to start as statistically normal, yet provide common pathways for them to become abnormal as they progress.

Regardless of their starting point, characters inevitably become abnormal at higher levels in many RPG systems, essentially becoming superheroes in a fantasy setting. This progression leads some GMs (myself included), to begin characters at higher tiers to ensure PCs are a little more extraordinary—and better able to survive—than a raw first-level character, even when using normal ability scores.

From the player's perspective, this decision hinges on the method of engagement: vicarious participation vs. acting. A player engaging vicariously might try to maintain a sense of "normal" behavior, doing what they would do in a given situation. Conversely, they may act "abnormally" due to the freedom afforded by the game. If the player views their role as an actor, the expectations of the rest of the table will strongly influence the character's level of normalcy.

In the end what's "normal" is really defined by the group. Most players play fantasy role-playing games to be heroes. And yet the basics of leveling systems like D&D imply that the character must start out weaker to make the journey all the more enjoyable, so that there is a clear difference in power between starting and ending a campaign. Levels provide the structure for superpowers, but adventuring makes those characters superheroes.

Your Turn: Are the heroes in your RPG games predominantly normal, abnormal, or somewhere in between?
 

log in or register to remove this ad

Lewis Pulsipher

Lewis Pulsipher

Dragon, White Dwarf, Fiend Folio
I play a normie in reality. I'm not too interested in playing one (or running for them) in my fiction. Definitely on the "heroes" side of things for me, though I'm not saying "no challenge."
 
Last edited:

I definitely lean into the normal. Though, im more on the competent scale than the total noob stumbles into a hero journey.

The distinction comes up a lot and folks are often confused what that means. I break it down this way. You either view heroic as in the deeds a person partakes at risk to themselves or you view heroic in the sense of ability and power of the character.

For example, there is a bank robbery in progress. You have Superman and you have John McClaine. Superman marches in and demands the robbers drop their weapons. This isnt much of a threat to Sup as those bullets would bounce right off him. Though, he is choosing to help people which is what makes him a good guy or a hero. McClaine on the other hand steps in to great risk to himself to try and stop this robbery. He is heroic becasue he is also choosing to help but has everything to lose from doing so. McClaine often feels not heroic to people because he gets beat up a lot and has to retreat and regroup on numerous occasions. He is not powerful.

I want McClaine in my RPGs, I do not want Superman.
 

I definitely lean into the normal. Though, im more on the competent scale than the total noob stumbles into a hero journey.
[snip]
I want McClaine in my RPGs, I do not want Superman.
I think this illustrates that this is a spectrum. McClaine feels pretty heroic to me despite his everyman vibe. He's still pretty competent, but even more so he's also insanely lucky, not just a "let the dice fall where they may" kind of guy. So when I say "heroes" this fits for me. What I'm thinking of is 3D6 straight and no mechanisms that allow heroism; that's not my thing.

Superman could be fine if he's facing challenges that are suitable to him, not just beating up hapless bankrobbers.
 

[snip]

I think this illustrates that this is a spectrum. McClaine feels pretty heroic to me despite his everyman vibe. He's still pretty competent, but even more so he's also insanely lucky, not just a "let the dice fall where they may" kind of guy. So when I say "heroes" this fits for me. What I'm thinking of is 3D6 straight and no mechanisms that allow heroism; that's not my thing.

Superman could be fine if he's facing challenges that are suitable to him, not just beating up hapless bankrobbers.
You are definitely leaning into power over deed. Im the opposite.
 

The debate over the fundamental nature of the hero has endured for centuries. As noted by author G. K. Chesterton (1874-1936), the appeal of the old fairy tale lies in making heroes start out as someone just like us. Conversely, Chesterton observed that the modern psychological novel often makes the hero abnormal. This distinction raises a perennial question for tabletop role-playing games: Are our heroes normal people or comic-book style superheroes?

This discussion continues a long-running inquiry into heroic identity, which we explored previously in discussions about whether heroes are born or made and how our perceptions of heroics have evolved from a black and white morality to shades of grey. Today, the focus is firmly on the question of normalcy.

What's Normal, Anyway?​

...

Your Turn: Are the heroes in your RPG games predominantly normal, abnormal, or somewhere in between?

I think you may miss an important point of your own question.

Chesterson was talking about psychological novels - which, in his context, is about the spiritual, emotional, and mental lives of his characters. Willy Loman, from Arthur MIller's Death of a Salesman, is a quintessentially "normal" psychological drama character.

Chesterson was writing before Tolkien's great popularity, and the rise of fantasy fiction, and before superhero comics were a thing - so, his question of normal vs abnormal is primarily about the psychology of the characters, not about fantastic abilities or powers.

To Chesterson, Spider-Man/Peter Parker would probably be largely "normal" in the sense he was speaking: He's basically a normal guy, with normal guy anxieties, cares and relationships, thrust into a really weird situation. While hyper-obsessed, protected by wealth Batman/Bruce Wayne would be abnormal.
 
Last edited:



Even point-buy systems, like the one used in Dungeons & Dragons 5th Edition, might force characters to start as statistically normal, yet provide common pathways for them to become abnormal as they progress.
In D&D 5th edition, even starting characters do not represent the statistical norm. Your 1st level halfling Fighter is better trained, better equipped, and more powerful than the majority of halflings in the setting. By level three, your halfling is like a Navy Seal if he had been bitten by a radioactive panther. There is nothing normal about a D&D PC no matter the level.

I do prefer games where player characters lean towards the normal side of the equation, especially as our good colleague @Umbran describes it. Even in a game like D&D, where the PCs are ridiculously heroic, most of the people I game with play characters that are psychologically normal.

(Disclaimer: The above paragraphs should be understood to be the sole opinion of MGibster and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of EN World, it's users, or any known affiliates thereof.)
 

Some say normal is the setting on a washing machine. Personally I like the characters to be ordinary people in extraordinary experiences. Though if someone wants things to be super heroic, or like in vampire, they had a lot of powers, it is cool, though one should pick rules to support it.
 

Related Articles

Remove ads

Remove ads

Top