AI/LLMs DLSS 5 will be the worst thing to EVER happen to video games

[Justice and Rule]

In these images, DLSS 5 doesn’t add any cosmetic product that didn’t previously exist. Grace is wearing the half-face of makeup she wore in the first image.

The guy on YouTube was wrong. He conjectured that DLSS added lipstick and blush, new materials, when all he had to to was comment on her rosier, healthier glow, which is just human blood flow.

View attachment 432916

Start showing images that add visible cosmetic product and not just natural cheek and lip color or stop making this argument.

You can disagree with how they frame it, but that doesn't make you right. And it also doesn't change that they are changing the dynamics of her nose in that shot you're showing. So, uh, I won't stop making this argument.

 

[Justice and Rule]

I mean, like, seriously, just put them close and side by side instead of the on-top stack and you can see the differences much more clearly.

 

[Morrus]

The reason it might not be copy-rightable might be because the AI itself would alwasy be creating derivative work, because it is fed with millions of pieces of art or photography to create (and the source and usage of this art and photography for this purpose is dubious, too).

The reason it's not copyrightable (not might, it's not) is because copyright is limited to human-created art, and the (US) courts have ruled that AI art does not qualify because it is not human-created.

 

[Tea Cozy]

I mean, like, seriously, just put them close and side by side instead of the on-top stack and you can see the differences much more clearly.

View attachment 432923

That’s not lip product. There is no new material added to her lips. No liner, lipstick, gloss, or stain. Just comment on rosier lips and stay grounded in fact. Why do people not want to be factual? Why is internet outrage clickbait sensationalism suddenly OK when it tells you things you want to hear?

 

[Justice and Rule]

That’s not lip product. There is no new material added to her lips. No liner, lipstick, gloss, or stain. Just comment on rosier lips and stay grounded in fact. Why do people not want to be factual? Why is internet outrage clickbait sensationalism suddenly OK when it tells you things you want to hear?

It's okay that you don't want to believe even when the evidence is there, like this clip where you can clearly see DLSS5 modifying proportions of people's heads, eyes, and other such things. It's clear in the transitions and any time you look at the face that it's very much modifying what's going on, and where it's getting that information from.

Look, if you want to like your new-age version of motion smoothing, more power to you. But I find this idea that it's not adding anything that might not be there to be rather hilarious when it's outright modifying facial structure.

 

[Justice and Rule]

I mean, let's have some more.

 

[Tea Cozy]

It's okay that you don't want to believe even when the evidence is there, like this clip where you can clearly see DLSS5 modifying proportions of people's heads, eyes, and other such things.

You still haven’t shown me added cosmetic materials.

I also think you meant to include a video and not a screenshot. I’ve seen the footage. The TerraBrew employee looks fine. Marika looks fine. Bethesda knows about Heller’s hair error, and say they are still tweaking things.

I’ve seen multiple critics of the tech still concede it helps Starfield.

 

[Justice and Rule]

You still haven’t shown me added cosmetic materials.

Buddy, if you don't see the added color as makeup like the vast majority of people do, I can't make you, just like I can't make you see the nose job or the blush. You can call it more color, but it's an AI filter that is referencing people in makeup.

I also think you meant to include a video and not a screenshot. I’ve seen the footage.

Cool, so you can see how it slims down her head and changes the size of her eyes. Cool cool cool.

The TerraBrew employee looks fine. Marika looks fine. Bethesda knows about Heller’s hair error, and say they are still tweaking things.

Tweak what, exactly? We already had an Nvidia employee give up the game that it's a filter taking in a 2D frame. What are they going to do about that?

I’ve seen multiple critics of the tech still concede it helps Starfield.

I mean, I have seen Oliver Mackenzie say that. Also in his video we see what look like ceramic cups become completely metallic.

So, yeah. I suppose if you just want an AI filter that requires a 5090 to run over your game, you can have it.

 

[Dragox27]

Buddy, if you don't see the added color as makeup like the vast majority of people do, I can't make you, just like I can't make you see the nose job or the blush. You can call it more color, but it's an AI filter that is referencing people in makeup.

I think it's very telling the primary defence of this has amounted to variations on disingenuous wordplay or outright denial of demonstrable facts.

 

[Tea Cozy]

Buddy, if you don't see the added color as makeup like the vast majority of people do,

I see a lot of people on the internet who don’t know about makeup making statements of conjecture and not fact.

They’re essentially saying Aloy is still wearing lipstick and blush in this undoctored image because her lips and cheeks are rosy.

Edit: Aloy’s eye waterline here does appear to have color. I looked things up and see that this is a thing in the game. Lining waterlines is something that goes back millennia. A really old technique is to put cosmetic on a rod, place the rod parallel to the eye, close the eye around the rod, and gently slide the rod across the waterline. People in some parts of the world still do this.

Cool, so you can see how it slims down her head and changes the size of her eyes. Cool cool cool.

Her face is in the middle of speaking.

Here is some video footage. The TerraBrew employee looks fine.

Starfield will use DLSS 5 upscaling..

Insider Gaming App Now Available:IOS: https://shorturl.at/rgWegAndroid: https://shorturl.at/upvemFor daily gaming news and exclusives subscribe:https://www.y...

m.youtube.com

I suppose this is the part where I caution people in general to be critical of social media and dodgy clickbait journalism.