Speaking of reading at all, I’m taking another hiatus. Family health care crises need more brain than I have; ice go to scrape together all the resources I can. Back when there’s significant progress on any of the fronts.
Jane Jacobs has been so widely ignored in practice because the people she (largely correctly, IMHO) identifies as sources of destructive action have immediate economic and social clout. It takes a lot to weaken them enough that people advocating alternatives can get any leverage. The story is...
People have been proclaiming the actual or imminent death of D&D since 1974. Waves of enthusiasm for the idea come and go, and since there’s more than one community involved, the tide can be coming in here and going out there, simultaneously.
Anyone who wants to see what small creators can do is invited to look at Ironsworn. AI would not improve it. And there are decades of great, beautiful games before that. And for that matter, good serviceable games that are not beautiful but work just fine for what the idea.
To think that AI...
I think the major shift with the Academy Awards and horror is the rise to prominence of more voters who like horror. Someone who grew up in the ‘70s-‘90s is more likely to have taken in a bunch of horror than someone who grew up in the ‘40s-‘60s. So they’re better equipped to evaluate horror movies.