CreamCloud0's latest activity

This was also discussed a month ago:

This is a consequence of the game over the decades changing how it describes combat. In a six-second combat round, you are actually...

Yep. They were brought up and the flaws were pointed out then, too. More noise is made by a successful check than a failed one, and...

and some of us believe that those implied servants ought to exist in a more defined state than just being an in-potentia obstacle to be...

I think that is generally accepted by now. The argument is about how this technique fits badly if you have play with some different...

Which some people like and some people don't.

Has the cook's existence been established prior to the roll for case (2)? If not, I find it nonsensical. In the worst case, this kind...

Not by RAW. By RAW you can do it in one action, which is 6 seconds. It takes that 6 seconds skilled, less skilled, or non-skilled...

(the bolded words seem very challenging to me, but I will answer my best) I guess the best way to put it, and answer your question...

Didn't see that one, and I don't agree with your premise that the GM can decide to not accept player action in the game that falls...

To me this whole argument seems to be you telling folks that no matter what, the GM needs to accommodate the player's creative desire...

bad luck is fine for climbing, bad luck is fine for lockpicking too, however, the existence of a cook is not a consequence of bad luck...

So you're saying I'm supposed to play favourites among the players? Accommodate for one but not for another? 'Cause that's how this reads.

Their characters are pretty much interchangeable widgets. The players, not so much.

Well, to me it is. Just because something isn't remembered doesn't mean it never happened.