I'm in my late 40s. I often meet people and chat with them about hobby stuff around my job area.
Every so often I meet someone mentioned D&D/RPGs and they show an interest. "Oh I've always wanted to try that." or "I used to play 10+ years ago." Etc etc.
So I invite them to my weekly game at...
Curse of Strahd is a remake adventure and they did end up changing a couple things. Like who and what the Vesanti are (IE less stereotypical trope gypsy). And it was also released before they tried to change D&Ds image to be more welcoming inclusive
As I said like 2 years ago in this thread. WotC is going to avoid doing anything that could be perceived as "problematic".
Heck the new Ravenloft book has a happy go lucky cover on in. They won't even grimdark the grimdark setting (atleast on the cover).
Exactly. Hasbro/WotC owns the brand name of the most famous RPG in the world. It behooves them to make it as "grey" as possible to meet the needs/standards of the most people. More people = more money.
A Corp generally isn't out to win or influence a culture war, they are there to make...
Could have sworn I read that somewhere when it was first announced. I didn’t care enough to dig it back up.
And are you sure it’s not a legit quote? You can kind of tell by how i referenced absolutely no one.
I don’t have an issue with her being an elf. It’s being the rogue.
It as I said, not every rogue has to be the sneaky type.
Or maybe she is IDK. Doesn’t really matter,
I just found it odd and frankly who cares what I think?
I wasn’t using “thicc” as a negative. Though “the youth” understand its use better than I.
It just seems odd to me that off all species and classes to make a fuller figured character they went with the typical dexterous rogue. A class meant to be nimble and stealthy. A worker in shadows...