Barely anything if I'm honest. Everyone that I have run has been playable straight out of the pages.
If I may ask, what are the specific elements you feel aren't ready for the table play?
My experience is almost the complete opposite. Full fledged out campaigns from the likes of 2nd editions Night Below through to Pathfinder 1st ed's adventure paths are nothing short of excellent.
Plot holes I can give. Some certainly do but I find they are often more a case of "who thought of...
I've found that if I want to generate an actual D&D monster, I have to say specifically that it is from Dungeons & Dragons. Then it tends to get it more right.
Thanks.
In general, mortals don't know as the common folk don't travel the Planes or otherwise interact, and gods don't create avatars. They tend to think that gods have always existed. Powerful Outsiders, like demon princes and archangels, are aware as they are much closer to those divinities...
In my homebrew setting, gods are simply aspects. They aren't like the deities of the Forgotten Realms or GreyHawk, who scheme, plot, create avatars and interfere in the mortal world. They are simply the creation of mortal and immortal beliefs.
This is how gods are described in my setting...
I never said generic plot. My issue with many campaigns/adventure path that I see, are that they often built into a specific setting hardwired into the campaign. ENW's own (but very good) War of the Burning Sky is a great example. You can strip it but as is, it is based around the specific...
Same. Adventure Paths were some of the best Pathfinder 1st products. I miss pre-written campaigns. Those that do exist are either too short (only 1st to 12th) or weird and not generic enough to fit into an existing setting.
I love Shackled City. One of my absolute favourites. I've run it many...
I'm used to 3rd edition and Pathfinder 1st, which had loads of books every year. I miss monster books, adventure paths/campaigns, sourcebooks...etc. I feel 2026 is going to be so quiet. :(
I used the free version for a few weeks at the start of last summer but the lack of images generated in 24 hours was the turning point to subscribe.
That makes sense for blocking access.
A friend of mine wanted me to create a picture of her for a 1920's Call of Cthulhu one shot where she was playing the maid. It wouldn't let me use the photo so I had to ask it to create someone similar with a couple minor changes. Unfortunately it views French Maid's outfit as too suggestive...
Sad dog issues? I don't know that reference.
If you mean what won't it let you do...
1. ChatGPT won't (and this has been the case before recent Musk AI issues) let you create an image from a photo of a real person. Not will it let you create a photo realistic image of a real person - even to...
I've tried free online AI and I've never been happy with the results. ChatGTP is the best but it limits you heavily so I do subscribe since I generate art and use it to help flesh out ideas for adventures and my campaign setting.