Recent content by el-remmen

If I were the optimistic type I'd say that this might mean that Wizards will do a better job of coordinating different aspects of the brand in order to capitalize on potential synergies (16 years since I worked in the corporate world and I still got the lingo down ;) ), so for example, a starter...

While I didn’t do a spread, I had players declare how many cards they planned to draw (0 to 3) and then I laid out that number face down before them like this: Player Declares then cuts the cards. Let’s say they declare 3. I lay out 1 and then put one aside “for the god of luck,” lay out...

So basically back to what Snarf originally described. 🤷🏽‍♂️

When/If I get a chance tonight I’ll share my opinions. But after using someone else’s deck as a reward the PCs were given a clue as to the location of another deck they might use to mitigate the negative effects of their first go round (or risk even worse results).

[double post]

I am out and about right now so can’t find the link but I did recently post about a version of the deck I made/used for one of my current games. My advice it to just decide on a number (like 22) and then just pick and choose what makes most sense for your game/setting/scenario/characters

I am out and about right now but I did recently post about a version of the deck I made/used for one of my current games. My advice it to just decide on a number (like 22) and then just pick and choose what makes most sense for your game/setting/scenario/characters.

I just want to state for the record that I would very happily try games run by either @hawkeyefan or @Maxperson

Just seeing an image of the Banana Splits starts to make me feel nauseated like I just realized someone had clandestinely dosed me with acid. I'm not kidding. They always gave me an oogy feeling as a kid - and on to today.

Middle School?! I had to have those memorized by 5th grade! It really is worth knowing, though. I credit playing D&D since I was 11 with my ability to do quick math in my head.

This explains why I struggled to use the laughing emoji as a response to Morrus's Bond opinion. ;):LOL:

Roger Moore. Bond is such an absurd and wacky concept that anyone who plays it straight fails and his approach seems to fit best. The Daniel Craig ones are the worst.

If that is your way of saying that thread is cursed. Then yeah, 💯

There are so many things I want to respond to in that thread, most of which are references to variations of the Kruger-Dunning Effect regarding evaluating your own play style and processes. But I won't.

I keep going back to that thread when I know I really shouldn’t. But the rest of the forum seems kinda slow lately.