Recent content by Emerikol

I'm saying that any book's popularity rises and falls over time and that D&D sent a lot of people out to buy the LOTRs in the late 70's and 80's. Just like the movies no doubt sent people out to buy the books. I'm not saying Tolkien was unheard of prior to D&D. I am saying it popularized it...

It's a nice overview. I don't care whether AI did it or not. I'm not sure why anyone does.

And I disagree if by ask you mean transfer the information and not use the specific word. My groups want to know if someone is a fighter, rogue, wizard, cleric, etc... They will try to discern that information in game. They might say "What are they?" when asking about race. They may not say...

I would definitely say that humanity leans evil overall. Just not far enough to lose it's neutral status. A demon leans even farther towards evil. Elves in my worlds at least lean good. So for me I see it two ways. There is the fundamental bent towards evil which humans have but there is...

It may be that all of this was synergistic. I don't know many former hippies that were reading LOTR's in the 70's. I do know that since D&D, Tolkien has never fall far out of the spotlight. The much later movies though didn't hurt to keep sustaining interest.

This is probably where we differ. All of those concepts are known in world for all of my campaigns that had them. They might not use the term "class" but they do know they are a wizard and they are aware of spell progression and when they get a feat. That is character knowledge. And I...

It had many influences of course and I think D&D made LOTR popular again as it was published in 1954. But LOTR's influence is still there in D&D. When I say loosely, I am not saying in every way. I'm saying there are some connections. Many of the races. The party concept. And of course...

I think D&D used to be loosely Tolkienesque.

The reviewer specifically said Owlbear Rodeo does not have a die roller.

In my games, it mostly only mattered for clerics. I also only allowed detect evil or alignment on beings of strong persuasion and most people were not. I like as a guideline for monsters it's useful. I could though be open to something else perhaps a faction system like 13th Age though I feel...

Wilderness Survival Guide says 48 miles on a light unencumbered riding horse. You can force march up to 72 miles but the chances for a lame horse go up. And exhaustion sets in rapidly so unless you arrive after 72 miles it's not good for an extended journey.

I agree. There is also the notion that with a group of new players the DM should go easy anyway until everyone gets a feel for their characters. The DM can then gradually turn the dial up as play progresses.

I just want a map, tokens, and a good die roller. I don't want to automate my game or character sheets. What should I use?

I never used the budgets even in 4e. With variable numbers of players, characters, skill, etc... it's all a crapshoot. And yes 4e isn't going to result in a TPK because honestly I went way beyond what was recommended with my group and never even sniffed a TPK. I did love the way monster stat...

In my world, I build sandboxes for ranges of levels. So start out we have some sort of base, and then there are tons of adventure locations all around that base. Players explore and discover what they want. There are NPCs (Good, Evil, and everything in between) who have agendas for the area...