Recent content by getgoldcardsoul

Hooray for PDFs! It's a shame I have to be one of those people who want---nay, NEED---the physical book(s) in my hands. Oh well. ;)

In all honestly, I'm not too surprised, though. With the 4E demons being located on a plane far removed from where the 4E devils reside, it makes sense that they wouldn't come to blows very often. Thus, no need for a blood war. With the Great Wheel, it just sort of made sense to me.

It's a shame the Blood War boxed set from Planescape 2E goes for so much freakin' cashola, otherwise I'd suggest taking a look at it as a reference to see why it's such a big deal. Edit: ...'course, then you still may not agree. <shrug>

Yeah really. I'm sick of seeing our "freedom of speech" being touted around like its proof that we're allowed to be cruel to each other. The "freedom" just means the government won't intercede when you say most things. By all means, if you have the ability to say something cruel, you have every...

You're really proving how unfunny this thread really is... with this unnecessary AND brutal display of chiding tactlessness.

I think we get your point: You're a hateful person who needs to disparage others ruthlessly.

I was wondering... ...do any of you think it would be a good idea if WotC does to DDM 1.0 conversions as they did with Chainmail (but actually stay consistent :p)? As new DDM 2.0 minis come out, they will undoubtedly have the same names as older minis (DDR will have plenty of basic 4.0 Monster...

That's just fluff. :p ;) At the crunchy core, they are the same thing (beautiful, charming monsters). ;)

I don't like this. If a person was to go throughout their day not intending to harm anyone, but in the process of daily life by complete accident harms another person (say, crashing into another's car or, to a less dramatic extent, bumping into someone), you don't tell the that person you hit...

Heh. Why not fold Nymph into that as well, then? Oh, different enough fluff (evil and nature), I guess. ;)

I always thought of Erinyes more like dominatrices (Lawful subtype as well as their Animate Rope type ability), seducing and then forcing men to do their will, while succubi are just out to destroy for the thrill. I figured those are different enough! ...but I guess this is a case of fluff being...

Yes, if the OP meant the post to be taken as a hardcore take-no-prisoners commentary, it would have been a hasty generalization to assume from his five D&D playin' girls that all or even most D&D playin' girls won't like 4E. But since it was just a funny rant, we can let it slide. :p ;) As...

QFT!!! Oh, thank you so much! It's nice to know that I'm not the only one who thinks this way. The first game I DMed, I had a... rather... well, (let's just say "not good") player who insisted every piece of treasure was split up by value, and if you wanted any single item you had to "pay...

As a player, I tried bothering with encumberence in the beginning of a AoW campaign. I even made sure my Heward's Handy Haversack didn't burst open! When I realized my DM didn't care, I began to overlook it. Besides, he treated every Bag of Holding/Handy Haversack as a somewhat infinite reserve...

All I can say is that I hope you guys are right. I've seen the other boards and it's ridiculous. Considering this thread and the attention the sticky threads that the moderators have posted relating to "bad form" posting, I'm looking forward to this board being my new home for D&D news. :D