Horwath's latest activity

not exactly, but if you could target tracks or object, DM would just say that you roll skills with advantage when it would be...

I would 1st to be on board for spell-less ranger, but that does not mean that Ranger have to be completely non magical. they can have...

Obviously ranger needs 13th and 17th level abilities as lower one sucks, especially 11th level. So, OK lets replace HM with other 1st...

that is lack of imagination, not grognardz. they could make an ability that gives advantage to tracking/perceiving things. barbarian...

I like 5E as an edition, but anything more complicated that tying your shoelaces is being coded as a spell. we really need 3.5e...

As people mentioned, it should be castable on tracks, or even an object that was in possession of the mark. but more importantly, it...

I have nothing against HM as a spell of itself, it's an OK spell, not great not terrible, what I hate is that even a fraction of rangers...

i hate hunters mark in all it's forms as a damage oriented spell, no matter how many buffs and class perks they try to assign to it...

right now features force players to use HM always, may rework just require ANY ranger Conc spell, including HM if you really like it...

also, you can use similar solution that other classes/subclasses use for concentration spells. Shorter duration: When you cast HM, you...

or how to not make ranger boring HM class, rework Favored enemy to work with all or most Ranger! spells. 1st level: you get additional...

it's not missing the point. missing the design point is making high level features depend on (not really good) 1st level spell. even...

The problem with hunters Mark is it should not be a spell in the first place. It should be a class feature that you can use a number of...

it's not a backup spell if later class features and subclass features spend "class points" on using HM. you either have HM on 24/7 or...

maybe 3rd level so everyone can poach it(heh) as a one level dip.