Recent content by Horwath

well, if there is min STR for best weapons really high, then there is no problem with dex being option for all melee attacks as for ranged as normal. IE: Bows: d4, STR 4 d6, STR 8 d8, STR 10 d10, STR 14 d12, STR 18 2d6, STR 20 (if you want, you can make that Small characters count their STR 4...

or just aim at the tracks. The mobility kill.

We expanded darkvision penalties to everything that can be tied to clear vision, Perception, Survival, Investigation, Insight, all craft checks, Thief tools, Darkvision is basically, here, you can fight without penalties.

yes and no. while there are weapons that can deal with armor, mostly blunt weapons, warhammers and poleaxes., armor was not doomed until reliable firearms came into battle. and even then armor is not obsolete, we have armor now. against fire arms. high medieval breastplate was immune to all...

not really, and they were better than arrows and bows of ancient times against armor. They really were difficult to train compared even to a bow. same way that guns replaced bows, as you can train someone how to use a gun in one day.

mostly mechanics, as in how the class is played. Also patrons, in any level you want to implement them. Honesty, you could take warlock patron as a wizard subclass and just change Cha with Int if you want to be a wizard that signed a deal with some Fey for some extra teleportation gimmicks.

mechanics are to them better than sorcerer mechanics?

Depends on how much player wants to make it. It is possibly different with clerics, depending on settings. But, Warlock can just be another variation of wizard/sorcerer, maybe not with better chassis, but sure more customizable. As for patron, it can be equalized with sorcerer origins, might...

1. remove subclass features from warlock 2. remove mystic arcanum from warlock like in playtest. 3. make those invocations. 4. add 10 more invocations slots. 5. Profit!

I ignore all rankings that are 3 or more ranks away from my ranking. I admit I am maybe slightly wrong on all rankings, but I refuse that I am that wrong. hahaha.

I think that all those are great tools to help built a background and facilitate great roleplay opportunity, be it from DM side or player side. But, if someone likes a paladin mechanically and want to play it as some "fighter" mercenary sell-sword, why not? And I had my fill of Lawful stupid...

this is baked in with damage die and possible reach. yeah, it's too simplified but it kind of works. smaller weapons do not get better weapon speed so larger do not get AC.

Since there is little problems with using short rests in 5E. As in, they are not really short and most of the time when you are able to take a short rest, you can take a long rest. With that said, spending HDs is not really a cost as in most days you don't even spend a single HD, so this is just...

maybe because it was best designed class, especially when we only had 2014 PHB. In the era of feats are optional and complicated and what not, warlock was only class that came with 8 build-in feat slots. maybe not as good as general feats, but they were yours to pick from.

Sorry, didnt make myself clear. I would rather have free Multiclassing that no multiclassing at all, no matter if it gets slightly off the rails. But, my suggestions are to keep the essence of 5E multiclassing, but keeping it in line. yes, it's similar to 2E in solution. we played that, worked...