Recent content by Incenjucar

As has been stated several times, in this specific context cozy has nothing to do with a vibe and everything to do with how far it gets into sex scenes.

You have to add spells to achieve this. There is certainly a conversation to be had about ensuring spells are all roughly as attractive or at least as likely to be useful, but they're not going to just errata everything from scratch.

The Cozy keyword in Romantasy 26E should not be confused with the Cozy energy type. While a Cozy Romance may use cozy energy its only mechanical implication is censorship resistance.

It's good to see growth in the fantasy genre that's not Harry Potter and Twilight. I'd love to see this sub-genre tackle all of the D&D settings - romance in Sigil or Athas or on a Spelljammer! I would also be amused if Paul Kidd's Justicar etc team found there way into one given other trends...

While magic is fairly common the world is not fully saturated with it and high level casters are still rare and precious and not super likely to want to play with boats or blowing up walls when they could be delving into the secrets of the universe or connecting with creatures from beyond. Plus...

I went ahead and picked up a copy at my FLGS just so I can see what the hype is about. Doubt I'll actually play it, but I may just learn something from it.

I fully agree, but at least the artist consented to the dubious deal - and surely Asmodeus' would approve.

While you should not expect it, it's not impossible to get an artist to provide art under a deal other than an immediate payment. A percentage of profit etc. can work as long as you're not asking for masterpieces. Don't abuse that possibility, but it's there.

LLMs do have some strong use cases when used to detect anomalies at scale, especially for things too complicated or abstract for humans to read, like obfuscated code. An LLM could be used to detect a weird anachronistic writing style being used in an otherwise consistent work.

There is of course the hypothetical scenario of better-designed AI that actually processes the information itself rather than just tokens, meaning it has to be to associate concepts with more than just the requency of assocation with tokens and build complex relationships between them, but aside...

It will remain in a quantum state. I am not willing to state a firm position on your skill without information, nor am I willing to spend the resources of time, privacy, and pedantic debating of the quality of your work to obtain that information. The point to be made is that your past...

And I currently deal with AI for a living and find errors in books that have been professionally edited on a regular basis. My job also involves a lot of editing. We can agree to disagree, but I'm not the right audience for that particular fallacy.

I always see people praising AI summaries and then I point out all the factual errors.

I am well aware of the approach. It gives you a small chance of better wording, a high chance of worse or incorrect wording, and remains disconnected from the work because it's not able to consider the whole. Its use is likely to muddle the writing and confuse the writer, and is thus most likely...

Creative works have one chance to get the right result. Scientific uses of GenAI generally work with a lot of expected failures but they can find the goodies in the pile of nonsense, and they do not need coherence between findings. The situations are very different. You don't use a gun as a...