Keldryn's latest activity
-
Keldryn reacted to Snarf Zagyg's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with
Haha.
Fair, but still... it's one of those "game" things that doesn't always mesh with the fiction of the world. I mean ... do the people in... -
Keldryn reacted to Sacrosanct's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with
Like.
No, I meant how they were handled and how it went down. Let's create this one monster to get a players! Now that we did this one... -
Keldryn reacted to kermit4karate's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
YAASSS!!! Probably the best example of all. You said it too. The idea was so awesome! Everyone wanted to play with psionics, and just...
-
Keldryn reacted to kermit4karate's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
Few examples of 1E rules that I never saw anyone actually using. These were widely considered poor ideas from the start: Combat rounds...
-
Keldryn reacted to Nikosandros's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
That is one long debate. My interpretation has always been that the rules for bards entirely supersede those for dual classing.
-
Keldryn reacted to Micah Sweet's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
Intentionality in RPG design is always a good thing IMO, even if I don't personally care for the results.
-
Keldryn reacted to billd91's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
The training rules really make the most sense in a context where the PCs are exploring a mega-dungeon relatively near a home base West...
-
Keldryn reacted to Flying Toaster's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
In retrospect it is kind of amazing how EGG’s writing could be so verbose while also being so thoroughly opaque, leaving important game...
-
Keldryn reacted to TiQuinn's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
I think the reason I bounce off any hard line discussion of 1e rules is just the actual structure and organization of the books...
-
Keldryn reacted to TiQuinn's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
Yeah, we never did this. We just leveled when the XP was reached, but only when the current adventure was concluded, and the party had...
-
Keldryn reacted to billd91's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
Let's face it, the leveling up and training rules didn't make a lot of sense either. They were pretty crippling to the thief as well...
-
Keldryn reacted to CreamCloud0's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
i think people would cry bloody murder if the 5e fighter was redesigned to have half the innate advantages like 1e fighter did...
-
Keldryn reacted to Kurotowa's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
As a mere babe who started with the dawn of 2e, I can't say how much of this was true in the 1e days. But when I started, one of the...
-
Keldryn reacted to TiQuinn's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Haha.
Conclusion: All of Snarf’s 1e Fighters just happened to have 18 Str and 18 Con. I’m sure he totally rolled it. 😁
-
Keldryn reacted to Staffan's post in the thread D&D General I'm a Fighter, not a Lover: Why the 1e Fighter was so Awesome with Like.
What about a fighter with Strength 17 and Constitution 16? Are they stronger than a cleric with Strength 18? Is a special class ability...